Next
Ruebenkraut

Ruebenkraut club

Posted: 28 Jul 2018

Taken: 28 Jul 2018

13 favorites     20 comments    305 visits

See also...

Keywords

fill flash •
SSC •
Saturday Self Challenge •
Zusatzblitz •

Authorizations, license

Visible by: Everyone
All rights reserved
305 visits

the green green

the green green
Saturday Self Challenge: "Using Fill Flash"
I was surprised that the flash made such a huge difference.

EXIF-DATA:
left: (no flash)
Canon EOS 700D ISO 100
Belichtung: 0.00063 sec. (1/1600)
Blende: f/3.5
Brennweite: 18.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 28.5 mm)

right: (flash)
Canon EOS 700D ISO 100
Belichtung: 0.005 sec. (1/200)
Blende: f/3.5
Brennweite: 18.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 28.5 mm)

PiP left: (no flash):
Canon EOS 700D ISO 100
Belichtung: 0.005 sec. (1/200)
Blende: f/3.5
Brennweite: 18.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 28.5 mm)

PiP right: (flash):
Canon EOS 700D ISO 100
Belichtung: 0.005 sec. (1/200)
Blende: f/3.5
Brennweite: 18.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 28.5 mm)

PiP bottom: alternative entry.
Translate into English

Leo W, Malik Raoulda, Heide, Karen's Place and 9 other people have particularly liked this photo

20 comments - The latest ones
 neira-Dan
neira-Dan club
le résultat est très psychédélique
5 years ago.
 Xata
Xata club
Não foi só o flash que fez a diferença, mas certamente que o resto não ficou regulado da mesma maneira, mas sem as EXIF como saber?
5 years ago.
Ruebenkraut club has replied to Xata club
You are right. See EXIF DATA in the description and my answer to Balatre.
5 years ago.
Xata club has replied to Ruebenkraut club
I see it and read your answer.
You can go on your settings ans choose to leave EXIFs visible... if you want, but I think we all should because it can help others, I do consider it like that, a way to learn, not a show-off (anyhow it is not the general mood here on ipernity!)
5 years ago.
 Ulrich John
Ulrich John club
Jaaaa ! Klasse !
5 years ago.
 Balatre
Balatre
Etrange résultat...
Le flash est sensé apporter de la lumière au premier plan tout en gardant à l'arrière plan sa lumière propre. Dans cet exemple, une surexposition générale semble avoir été provoquée. Je suis d'accord avec Xata, les réglages de l'appareil ont surement été modifiés entre les deux prises de vues
5 years ago. Edited 5 years ago.
Ruebenkraut club has replied to Balatre
I put the EXIF-DATA in the description (see above). You are right: I was on AV-Modus and did only open the flash. Camera changed the shutter speed accordingly. But I will take a new trial and keep aperture and shutter speed fixed. Will show results in PiP.
5 years ago. Edited 5 years ago.
 Marie-claire Gallet
Marie-claire Gallet
KLASSE, Henning ********************* Schoener Samstag !!!!!!!!!!!
5 years ago.
 Annaig56
Annaig56 club
excellent résultat sur les 2 versions, très surprenant,
5 years ago.
 Valfal
Valfal
According to the Exif data you provided, it appears that the exposure setting changed between non-flashed and flashed versions, which would have significantly changed the exposure of the background as well as foreground of the images. It looks like you used faster exposure for the non-flashed image than the one with flash, so it is hard to tell how flash fill-in would have impacted the flash version compared to non-flashed. I would love to see this comparison between the two with exposure settings the same, because the subject and location you chose were a perfect fit for this technique! :-)
5 years ago.
Ruebenkraut club has replied to Valfal
Valfal, you are right. I took another pair of pictures with fixed aperture and shutter speed, only changed the flash. You can see the results (not spectacular) in the PiP.
5 years ago. Edited 5 years ago.
 Balatre
Balatre
Pour moi, la première version sans flash a un arrière-plan correctement exposé. (Sur toutes les autres il est surexposé) Je serais donc parti des valeurs Exifs de cette première photo et j'aurais intégrer le flash avec ces valeurs juste pour ajouter ce qu'il faut de lumière sur le volubilis.
5 years ago.
Ruebenkraut club has replied to Balatre
Yes you are right, but this was not possible, because the second set of pictures was taken some hours later and the sun did not shine as bright. So I tried 1/1600 sec. and it was too dark.
5 years ago.
 Roger Bennion
Roger Bennion club
The difference is surprising. I do like the way the Fill Flash version has created an almost painterly effect, Ruebenkraut :-)
5 years ago.
 Gillian Everett
Gillian Everett club
Great comparison, well done! Diptych is a great way of presenting it.
5 years ago. Edited 5 years ago.
 Karen's Place
Karen's Place club
The background of the left photo with the foreground of the left PIP would have been close to ideal. You've done a lot of experimenting here and that's what it's all about. Kudos to you for your efforts! And for the extra set of images. :)
5 years ago.
 Chrissy
Chrissy club
ging mir ganz genau so! Werde versuchen ihn mal öfter zu benutzen
5 years ago.
 Heide
Heide club
Sehr schön, die Unterschiede zu sehen.
Klasse Arbeit.
5 years ago.
 ╰☆☆June☆☆╮
╰☆☆June☆☆╮ club
Lovely contribution for the challenge, well done;-)
5 years ago.
 Leo W
Leo W club
schöner und interessanter Vergleich
5 years ago.

Sign-in to write a comment.