Birds Of A Different Feather
Still Standing
Archway
Switch Plate
Fireplace
Bathroom Light
Stripping
Wallpaper
Paneling
Nail
Some Settling Of Contents May Have Occurred
Beam
Stucco
Stove Pipe
Switch Cover
Mantle
Shelf
French Doors
Tile
Slats
Alien Planet Landscape
Stairs
Window
Hanging Light
Wainscoting
Sliding Door
Foma Fomapan 400
MG MGB GT
1979 Ford Pickup
Foma Fomapan Classic 100
Foma Film
Dine Out
Cattails
Rest In Peace
Langford
The Shed Again
Ebenezer Methodist Church Bell
Shoreline
This Old Barn
Tanks
Field Of No Horses
Hacienda
Water Relics
Farmlands Of Southern Illinois
Norris City Memorial Library
School Mascot
Pig Out
My Annoying Big Brother
War Machine
Marking Time
Country Estate
Powell General Baptist Church
See also...
See more...Keywords
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
-
553 visits
Remember, Only You Can Prevent Forest Fires
An old Smokey Bear sign.
Camera: Carena DF-300 (Minolta X-300/X-370 clone)
Lens: Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm, f/1.2
Film: Foma Fomapan Classic 100 B&W
Shooting Program: Manual
Aperture: f/11
Shutter Speed: 1/125
Date: February 22nd, 2019, 12.11 p.m.
Location: Norris City, Illinois, U.S.A.
Developing Chemicals at 68 degrees
Water pre-soak: 5 minutes
Caffenol CM-RS: 11 minutes
Water rinse: 1 minute
Ilford Ilfostop stopbath: 1 minute
Water rinse: 1 minute
Ilford Hypam fixer: 9 minutes
Water rinse: 2 minutes
Kodak Photo-Flo 200: 1 minute
Carena DF-300 Foma 100 Feb 2019 18ef
Camera: Carena DF-300 (Minolta X-300/X-370 clone)
Lens: Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm, f/1.2
Film: Foma Fomapan Classic 100 B&W
Shooting Program: Manual
Aperture: f/11
Shutter Speed: 1/125
Date: February 22nd, 2019, 12.11 p.m.
Location: Norris City, Illinois, U.S.A.
Developing Chemicals at 68 degrees
Water pre-soak: 5 minutes
Caffenol CM-RS: 11 minutes
Water rinse: 1 minute
Ilford Ilfostop stopbath: 1 minute
Water rinse: 1 minute
Ilford Hypam fixer: 9 minutes
Water rinse: 2 minutes
Kodak Photo-Flo 200: 1 minute
Carena DF-300 Foma 100 Feb 2019 18ef
Berny, Eric Desjours have particularly liked this photo
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
As said on my other comment there, I am sure no one has interest or time to go through each and every image like this one. But since you are more or less asking, this actually does infringe the copyright, as far as I correctly understand this list of 'Copyright rules by subject matter' available at Wikimedia Commons:
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Noticeboards_and_signs
The point is that if this sign is from 1960s, then very likely there is not long enough time gone for this sign to become as public property.
And I seem to have done the same mistake:
www.ipernity.com/doc/serola/48532814/in/album/1226796
Well, it is then up to you (and me) whether we let these images stay, or remove them. Very likely not many others are interested. BUT, if taking the copyright rules word for word, then we both do infringe the copyright.
You may find also this upload of mine as interesting:
www.ipernity.com/doc/serola/48694564
There I have really tried to think it through, if I have right to use toys as subject. Copyright is tough, especially for photographers! It is so easy to infringe it without even noticing it.
HaarFager club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to HaarFager clubHowever, what really worries me, and I guess also the IMA team is worried about, are those blatant cases. I give you an example.
Today I just discovered one user here at ipernity, who have republished a photo originally taken by Robin Loznak. What makes that case outrageous is that this ipernity user had even seen trouble to claim her/his copyright on the caption, with many words. This user had even added a broad frames and her/his signature on it. In my opinion such a behavior is morally and ethically wrong.
Personally I wouldn't become worried of photographing and publishing images of signs and possibly copyright protected artifacts from time to time, more or less by accident. If one is still most of the time posting entirely her/his own works, this is then perfectly alright. But to keep ipernity reputation good, we should keep those blatant cases at bay.
HaarFager club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubTrue, true. People who do that are just wrong. It is wrong to steal.
Sign-in to write a comment.