High key...
"The only good fence ...
Thumb exercise..
Private book collection
Bedtime
Alien eye
Viewing
At the office
Umbrella
Fisheye lens experiment
Macro lens experiment
Pikku Kakkosen Puisto ...
Even plants need fences ...
Fences ...
Welcome to Tampere!
Cold ...
Friday fence portrait collection
Lizard
Gula
Love ...
Mobile phone 48/50
Mobile phone 49/50
Building blocks ...
Kitsch
Dreaming cupid
Day 7
Seen on the window
Day 6
Study of a bottle
Day 5
My name is Sami...
Last summer...
Day 4
Day 3
What I did last summer
Day 2
Day 1
Tree's dream
Mirror image
Night Stalker
Friday morning blues
So long autumn...
Encounter
Sharing and Social networks
Must have tools...
See also...
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
- Photo replaced on 06 Nov 2017
-
562 visits
Dreaming of ...
... white Christmas(?)
High key photography can and should be taken into account already on the shooting settings, and overexpose the image at least +1 EV, or even more! But then especially on digital photography comes the danger of loosing most of the details. Therefore it is maybe a better approach to do the rest on photo editor.
A "good image" should also have a spot of full black and then some pure white. But on a subject like this there are number of problems. There are no really dark areas, and if the background is very white, then the edges of a white subject disappears totally.
Here I did number of things. I first overexposed +1 EV, then did quite much editing on Snapseed software, like adding some white vignetting. But even that did not seem to be enough. So, I had to give the final touch on PicMonkey.
It of course also much depends on the context as well. On a bad computer screen it is not easy to get anything right. And when image becomes viewed against white background, then it becomes obvious if there are no pure white on the image. And vice versa. On black background something that is supposed to be a high key image quite likely looks that way.
On notes I give you some other shots on the topic, to give you the scale and other point of views on this tiny snow globe cupid and its larger companion. These kitsch cupids are great practice targets! And it is like shooting the shooter! =D
Camera details
Camera: Sony Xperia Z1 Compact mobile phone F5321
Exposure: 0.03 sec. (1/32)
Aperture: f/2.0
ISO: 80
Exposure value: +1
Focal Length: 4.2 mm (approximately 35mm equivalent after 1.2 times zooming and cropping)
Lens: External clip on magnifying glass ("macro lens").
For some reason EXIF dropped out during the editing?
High key photography can and should be taken into account already on the shooting settings, and overexpose the image at least +1 EV, or even more! But then especially on digital photography comes the danger of loosing most of the details. Therefore it is maybe a better approach to do the rest on photo editor.
A "good image" should also have a spot of full black and then some pure white. But on a subject like this there are number of problems. There are no really dark areas, and if the background is very white, then the edges of a white subject disappears totally.
Here I did number of things. I first overexposed +1 EV, then did quite much editing on Snapseed software, like adding some white vignetting. But even that did not seem to be enough. So, I had to give the final touch on PicMonkey.
It of course also much depends on the context as well. On a bad computer screen it is not easy to get anything right. And when image becomes viewed against white background, then it becomes obvious if there are no pure white on the image. And vice versa. On black background something that is supposed to be a high key image quite likely looks that way.
On notes I give you some other shots on the topic, to give you the scale and other point of views on this tiny snow globe cupid and its larger companion. These kitsch cupids are great practice targets! And it is like shooting the shooter! =D
Camera details
Camera: Sony Xperia Z1 Compact mobile phone F5321
Exposure: 0.03 sec. (1/32)
Aperture: f/2.0
ISO: 80
Exposure value: +1
Focal Length: 4.2 mm (approximately 35mm equivalent after 1.2 times zooming and cropping)
Lens: External clip on magnifying glass ("macro lens").
For some reason EXIF dropped out during the editing?
Wierd Folkersma, Nora Caracci, .t.a.o.n., ColRam and 26 other people have particularly liked this photo
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Gudrun clubLove this little Angel
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Erika+Manfred clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Erhard Bernstein clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to niraK68 clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Ulrich John clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to LotharW clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Percy Schramm clubThank you and have a nice week, Percy =)
Thanks for your explanation Sami...was difficult for me this week!
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Tanja - Loughcrew clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to protoxSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Chrissy clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to JanSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Cheryl Kelly (cher12… clubBest wishes, Christien.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Chris10 clubSign-in to write a comment.