I and a Majority of Members of Ipernity want the right to link back to where I saw an image in any optional form set out by a group. As said before what is the point of having ipernity groups at all if there is a continued ban on linking back to a group. ( for those who don’t want a link back they can chose there settings to avoid how comments appear on their page)
A continued lack or resolve of this issue has so far led to so many groups closing and many members leaving Ipernity. It is my opinion that if you do not address this issue finally and immediately many more will exit ipernity.
The reason is simple. No link back to where image was viewed equals a useless point to posting images to groups.
Regards Tess
Articles by Treasa Ui Cionaodha
IP on self destruction course:
-
Ticket #29055
I have another question...
This conversation is followed by Léastaff. (2 days ago)…
-
14 Sep 2014
Possible deleting of some Groups by Ipernity
-
In my opinion
Regarding Ipernity’s decision to consider the possibly somewhere in the future to del…
-
21 Oct 2013
See all articles...
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone (public). -
All rights reserved
-
831 visits
Valfal has particularly liked this article
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
IP says "This message is a private correspondence. We do not authorize you to divulge it". Ergo I cannot show you the actual response. But you can guess by my point by point reply what the content of the message contained in part.
When you finish reading it note the end result of my reply ( Lea obviously did not like it) Lea closed this Ticket. Moral of the story Don't dare to have your say OUCH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thursday March 6, 2014 at 10:45AMTess Mc Kenna says:
Ticket #29055
Hi Lea
Thank you for your response however I was not pleased with the below issues you raised therein.
Ip's promise to all members as stated below
"Please note that these improvements are in the process of being developed and will be available in a fortnight. We will announce it on this blog.
Catch you soon,
The ipernity Team"
1) Please Note the above is where IP team set out time frame for the introduction of a solution to resolve the ongoing current issue This was ( as I understand) for all members of IP and not for just for me.
I object to you personalizing and suggesting when you said you quote "I'm really sorry to not be fast enough for you." ( In effect Suggesting that is it is only me awaiting your resolve).
2) You said? “Could you please realize that we have other users with requests different from yours” I really object to your inference that I have no realization of how many other issues IP have outstanding to resolve. I have never referred to this subject. But you did introduced the subject when you said “Please note that it was in some of your replies you said (and the IP team) promised that the current issue was a matter of Priority ( I assume you meant IP intended make this issue the first to be solved before all other outstanding issues)
3) I said “Still waiting for your promised improvement” .You said “If you can't be patient, you may be disappointed” Regards,lea I never referred to my lack of patients.
Lastly (and it’s just an idea on my part). If IP had acknowledged the time frame for resolving the issues raised in the current blog was behind schedule and suggested a projection of a new time frame it would be a helpful piece of information.
Regards Tess
This message was read 21 hours ago.
Lea thanked me for my message and the time I spent to help us (IP). Said my remarks were noted and said she would keep me informed !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ?????????????????
Sign-in to write a comment.