2 favorites     7 comments    227 visits

Location

Lat, Lng:  
You can copy the above to your favourite mapping app.
Address:  unknown

 View on map

See also...


Keywords

canals
Belgium
Europe2016


Authorizations, license

Visible by: Everyone
Attribution + non-Commercial + no derivative

227 visits


Belgium Ronquières canal incline (#0196)

Belgium Ronquières canal incline (#0196)
Looking down the tracks from the upper portion of the incline. I find it confounding to think of the level of public investment in creating such a structure. In the western US, our trains still mostly cross the mountains of the west on privately-owned right-of-ways that were originally built in the late 1800’s for the much slower pace of those days and have been only marginally modernized since; the canals that we do use are seem to be comparatively simple dam/lock combinations created in the 1950’s. Unless I’ve really missed something, we don’t have nearly the investment in infrastructure that’s illustrated by the incline. A second confounding factor was the investment in barge traffic. While we do still have significant barge traffic in parts of the U.S., we don’t seem to be nearly as reliant on this form of economically and probably environmentally more favorable form of transportation. Most startling, to me, about this structure was the level of public access. Given the very high level of security we have placed around similar such structures in the U.S. and the likelihood that someone photographing as I was would be stopped by a guard, I consistently felt that someone must be about ready to stop me from wandering around the various structures of the incline – but they weren’t. I assumed that I must have been watched while exploring, but I could find nothing to indicate that was actually happening. I was amazed at the ability to freely explore around the incline.

I came away from this questioning the U.S. reliance on free-market solutions, our comparatively primitive use of environmentally-beneficial technology, and our focus on security at a level that approaches paranoia.

, have particularly liked this photo


7 comments - The latest ones
 slgwv
slgwv
Well, my impression is more of an apotheosis of 19th century technology! Mega-infrastructure that is becoming archaic--

And, if the US had relied _more_ on free-market solutions for railroad development, we wouldn't have so many rails-to-trails, especially in the West. As it was, the heavy subsidies, with the land grants and all, led to massive overbuilding, especially in the Northwest. But the old railroad grades do make for nice trails-- ;)
9 years ago.
 Diane Putnam
Diane Putnam club
I suppose once the West was settled, cars were invented and all those interstate highways were built in the '50s, America lost interest in rail.

There are two significant railroad trails in Klamath Co., one was the old Weyerhaeuser Timber railroad and another, much longer one, the OC&E* trail, also for logs and lumber. Both were built for a single industry and run mostly out in the middle of nowhere. They were doomed.

*Oregon California & Eastern

That ramp is massive, I'm trying to picture how that works. I'm assuming the lift machinery drives up the ramp...but then what?
9 years ago. Edited 9 years ago.
slgwv has replied to Diane Putnam club
At one point there were at least three main lines crossing Montana and the Idaho Panhandle on the way to Seattle--the Northern Pacific, the Milwaukee Road, and what would become the Burlington Northern. Now, Seattle was an attractive market--but there was no way it would support _that_ much traffic! But if the gov't is giving away land and timber if you build a railroad, the actual economics become almost irrelevant-- The Milwaukee Road R/W is now the Hiawatha Trail, and (IIRC) the Northern Pacific's is the Centennial Trail, along the Coeur d'Alene River.
9 years ago.
Don Barrett (aka DBs… club has replied to Diane Putnam club
The caisson (ferry) opens into the canal at the top. Here's a Youtube of it in operation (in French) : www.youtube.com/watch?v=icq8P-vFn7g
9 years ago.
Don Barrett (aka DBs… club has replied to slgwv
Interesting argument. I knew about the land grant/railroad connection, but had wondered how we ended up with too many railroads particularly in the Northwest.
9 years ago.
 Clint
Clint
My first thought is that this seems like a huge investment to lift a barge 222 feet, in what is a small, densely populated country that might be better served by different modes. The economics of shipping by barge in the U.S. work because of the scale. A single tug can push an immense amount of tonnage with a relatively small energy input. But this canal seems small enough that a single tug can't haul nearly so much, and then you have to add whatever it takes to drag the barge up this ramp. I almost wonder whether it might be more economical and energy-friendly to just haul everything around Belgium on trucks.

Despite my tendency to drive everywhere, I've often wished we'd made greater public investment in passenger rail in the U.S. and spent a little less on paved roads. But population density is so small over vast portions of the nation that the economics are difficult to manage. Then again, we've massively subsidized auto and truck travel by building a huge network of highways that never pays for itself. It seems like we could sink a little more money into a subsidized rail network and worry a little less about profitability.
9 years ago.
Don Barrett (aka DBs… club has replied to Clint
Re the canal, what I haven't put into my descriptions was that the widening and modernization of the canals was an EU decision. This canal connects portions of France with the port at Antwerp. I'm only myself beginning to grasp the extent that large portions of interior Europe are connected both through 'canalized' rivers and manmade canals. Later I'll be posting photos of the port of Berlin. There's an interesting map on the following link of canals across Europe but it is unfortunately for tourism, I'd like to know better the use of canals for trade. www.eurocanals.com/Waterways/europecountriesi.html

I debated a comment on rail usage in the U.S., but that's too long a comment for here, for day!
9 years ago. Edited 9 years ago.

Sign-in to write a comment.