See also...
Keywords
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
-
29 visits
this photo by Dinesh
Malik Raoulda, Ulrich John, John FitzGerald and 2 other people have particularly liked this photo
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
the structure of the faculty of sensibility
1 Newton and Leibniz on
Space and time
Space is like ourselves: although we live with ourselves constantly and with great familiarity, when we ask who or what we essentially are, the question usually leaves us dumbfounded. How a condition so close to s can be so inexplicable, in the puzzle surrounding space as well. To unveil space’s deepest truth, one might imagine travelling to the far corners of the universe, but no matter how far one travels, resolving that mystery is no different from fathoming the distance between one’s eyes and the words on this page. ~ Page 50
. . . . On Leibniz’s view, the souls and their objects come first, and space and time appear as secondary structures derived in reference to the perceptual contents of the simple souls. Within this outlook, space and time are merely relationships, or orderings, between perceived objects, so without supposing some objects with which to start, there would be no space or time.
On this particular point, Kant disagrees. He maintains that the objects in space and time cannot exist independently of space and time. To him, the reverse is true; first, we have in our minds the empty containers of space and time, and then, our sensory experience fills space and time with objects that it given to us. ~ Page 52
Sign-in to write a comment.