Group: Panasonic, Olympus Micro Four thirds


Comparing 4/3rds technology with 35mm film.


HappySnapper
18 Aug 2019 - 2 comments - 166 visits- Permalink   |   Translate title into English

I really struggle with the idea that a 12-32mm 4/3rds lens is the same as a 24-64mm lens if it were a 35mm film camera, the simple fact is that my 4/3rds camera isn't a 35mm film camera. It is what it is and it has a focal length of upto 32mm, knowing that it is the equivalent of 64mm if it were a film camera is of no practical use when taking photographs with 4/3rds technology. All it tells me is that having taken a photograph with my 4/3rds camera to repeat the shot using a 35mm film camera I would have to use a 64mm lens. So What !!!, yet they sell 4/3rds on the back of technology that became outdated in 1995 or before. So am I missing something? can anyone explain it differently so that I understand how important it is that I should know the difference.
Comments
 Peter Castell
Peter Castell club
I don't think it matters at all, you need too know what to expect from your camera not a different format, I think part of it is the 'Mines Bigger Than Yours' mentality to me this seems especially true of Cannon owners who won't accept the advances in the technology of m4/3rds.
There is nothing magical about 35mm it was just a way of selling more cinema film
To me there seems to be a lot of snobbery in photography the technology being more important that the actual photo
6.6 years ago.
HappySnapper has replied to Peter Castell club
Good point Peter, You only have to look at some of the images uploaded to IP taken with older film cameras by the more disconcerting hobbyist and no modern digital can reproduce the quality and tones without the use of post processing.
6.4 years ago.

You must be a member of this group to reply to this topic. (Join?)