Evolution/consequences
Sunset
Testing the ice
The Human Condition
Frozen
Feb 25th 2007
At Farmer's Market
Algorithm
Winter Tree
Crossing
Power of Mitrochondria
Nothingness
Cipher as a Code & a Zero
Art Gallery
Exterior
Osmington Village
A Capriccio of the Roman Forum
Ave Caesar! Morituri te salutant
Beharrlich
Passage
The Black Burnswickers [1860]
Autumn foliage
An Orchid
Tulips
Tulip & the firmament
Crocus
February 8th 2013
substituer à peindre
substituer à peindre
Window Tree
Money/Geld/dinheiro/ 貨幣/ பணம்/ деньги/ অর্থ/ เงินต…
Samskrata ~ Sanskrit ~ संस्कृतम्
What goes with it A or B
Abandoned
Shaving
Manchester
There comes a moment
Lilly
Petunia
Musician
Artist
Keywords
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
-
176 visits
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
Such similarities also can be noted between Hinduism and Aristotelianism, particularly in the writings of modern Indian sages Swami Vivekananda, J. Krishnamurthi, and, of course, M. K. Gandhi. The “Bhagavad- Gita” says Hindus must perform their karma (duty) in line with their dharma (moral philosophy governing all actions to do good) and do so to the very best of their abilities without reference to whatever rewards may follow. In other words, Hindus must act not for praise, honor, money, or public opinion. Their actions and the logic behind those actions should be reason enough to perform at the very highest level their minds, bodies, and souls can deliver. Dharma is, it seems akin to virtue, and the Aristotelian lesson of the Gita is that it is morally fraudulent to do something, even the right thing, for wrong reason.
Thus, one can be an Aristotelian and also be a believing Buddhist, Christian, Moslem, Hindu, or Jew. Yet one also can be an Aristotelian and, at the same time, unreligious and non believing. That’s because Aristotle was a philosopher and not a prophet or priest. In the final analysis, religion is based on faith and philosophy on reason. The two paths to finding meaning may end up in the same place, but their methods are distinct and shouldn’t be confused. It is enough for the Buddha to assert that greet is a vice; it is necessary for Aristotle to demonstrate that it is so. And the act of moral reasoning is not the same as obeying a religious precept. In sum, religion is no more a substitute for philosophy than philosophy is a substitute for religion. Aristotle found the two to be necessary, instrumental goods in his own virtuous life. ~ Page 189 & 190
Sign-in to write a comment.