Fence to keep children safe
#07 A graffiti picture (not just a tag)
#24 A clock tower
#21 A yellow car! ✊
#25 Something someone has lost
#40 In a cemetery
#42 Something vintage
✂ ✄
Rise and shine!
You are here
#14 A book in a different language to yours.
Please go around...
#44 A fence
#31 A park bench
#12 A busker
Circumference vs. Height
Shooting the shooter
#05 Spring flowers
#43 Pareidolia
#47 Someone up a height
#20 A flag
#27 Men/women at work
Snow sculpture
#01 A landmark
From the archives: Hairy ballpoint
RⴹᗡЯUM
Elevation
Spring
▲
Gravel concentration
Summer in Ireland
The forces of nature
Tampere railway station
♡♡
Man with a Harmonica
☾
Helsinki Central Library
"Spaghetti Western"
47
Portraits
Perforation
Friday Morning
On my way to home
My right ear
Aural sculpture
See also...
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
Free use
- Photo replaced on 22 Mar 2019
-
777 visits
#SaveYourInternet
UPDATE:
European Parliament approved new copyright rules for the internet:
www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20190321IPR32110/european-parliament-approves-new-copyright-rules-for-the-internet
How this affects on ipernity is supposedly and hopefully here:
(37a) "... The definition of an online content sharing service under this Directive ... does not include services which have another main purpose than enabling users to upload and share a large amount of copyright protected content with the purpose of obtaining profit from this activity ..."
The approved proposal available for example here:
juliareda.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Copyright_Final_compromise.pdf
My personal wish is that you all try to keep our web site clean out of copyright infringements anyway. To help you understand all possible dangers of infringing the copyright by accident, please start for example from here:
www.ipernity.com/blog/serola/4714022
ADDITION
I guess people may easily misunderstand the new EU Copyright Directive's Article 11 (so called "link tax"). As far as I have found out, it only concerns the news media articles less than two year old. Using other citations and links to them is not covered there on Article 11. So, you are free to cite for example Wikipedia articles, which are anyway published under Creative Commons. The same is with for example short citations of song. You can still do that. But not the whole texts.
Moreover, my person guideline is that whenever I cite some text or give for example link to any content, I try to make sure the source is legal. And that is because I do not want to support someone else shamelessly infringing the copyright. So, links and citations on trusted sources is a good and recommended procedure.
European Parliament approved new copyright rules for the internet:
www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20190321IPR32110/european-parliament-approves-new-copyright-rules-for-the-internet
How this affects on ipernity is supposedly and hopefully here:
(37a) "... The definition of an online content sharing service under this Directive ... does not include services which have another main purpose than enabling users to upload and share a large amount of copyright protected content with the purpose of obtaining profit from this activity ..."
The approved proposal available for example here:
juliareda.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Copyright_Final_compromise.pdf
My personal wish is that you all try to keep our web site clean out of copyright infringements anyway. To help you understand all possible dangers of infringing the copyright by accident, please start for example from here:
www.ipernity.com/blog/serola/4714022
ADDITION
I guess people may easily misunderstand the new EU Copyright Directive's Article 11 (so called "link tax"). As far as I have found out, it only concerns the news media articles less than two year old. Using other citations and links to them is not covered there on Article 11. So, you are free to cite for example Wikipedia articles, which are anyway published under Creative Commons. The same is with for example short citations of song. You can still do that. But not the whole texts.
Moreover, my person guideline is that whenever I cite some text or give for example link to any content, I try to make sure the source is legal. And that is because I do not want to support someone else shamelessly infringing the copyright. So, links and citations on trusted sources is a good and recommended procedure.
Spo, Annaig56, Berny, Peter_Private_Box and 35 other people have particularly liked this photo
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Annemarie clubEven for authors this would be a disaster, when most of the photo sharing web sites would have to close offering platforms to share one's works.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Wierd Folkersma clubThis really can close also ipernity! We can't afford to implement any filters! And we can't afford to pay for any possible copyright infringement lawsuits raised against the ipernity members association either. We all would become responsible on something done by few ignorant users.
This is the same SOPA and PIPA in 2012: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_SOPA_and_PIPA
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to * ઇઉ * clubI have tried to clean my own closets lately from mistakes done before, as I have tried to become more observant on what to like (fave).
But the filters what there are talked about on Julia Reda's article are probably some automatic filters: juliareda.eu/2017/09/when-filters-fail
So, a service provider like ima first of all can't afford to get one, they are not reliable, and most likely such filters only serves rich stake holders only (e.g. Disney).
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubRegarding the filters Julia Reda mentioned, I guess the same as you and hope for the best for institutions like ipernity, as mentioned in my comment below.
will change completely. And not necessarily to our advantage.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Taormina clubLike supermarket chains killed small shops and asphixiate small producers.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Xata clubBoarischa Krautmo club has replied to Ruesterstaude clubIn unserer Gesellschaft, in der mittlerweile ein Großteil der Diskussion online stattfindet, ist das tödlich für Freiheit und Demokratie.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Ruesterstaude clubMore or less stating the same worry that I have. Only the big companies and stake holders can then survive.
@All - The same article is also available in English: thehmm.nl/is-article-13-really-the-end-of-the-open-internet
Ruesterstaude club has replied to Boarischa Krautmo clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to neira-Dan clubThis article could do with being in a more prominent position.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Tractacus clubOr use image of your own, or just a black square. Moreover, PicMonkey gives you tools to add text on images easily.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Frank J Casellaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_SOPA_and_PIPA
That was more or less similar case then.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Annemarie clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to * ઇઉ * clubCaption updated ;-)
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubI hope the best for institutions like ipernity.
Have a great weekend.
BTW, I wanted to thank you so much for your comments on my pictures. You're wonderful. You make me happy and you make me smile, and I love to read your opinions and feelings because dude, I totally love and respect your eye, your style, your ideas, and that brilliant mind behind the lens. It's awesome to me that you like my photography because I sure do find you to be quite the inspiration! *big hugs*
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Janet Brien clubAnd the feeling goes both ways. Your creativity (especially including your wonderful stories) inspires me to continue here.
But what a nightmare if this goes into effect. :(
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Karen's Place clubKaren's Place club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubTractacus club has replied to Karen's Place clubKaren's Place club has replied to Tractacus clubI wrote to our Member of the EP already some months ago - but didn't get any response at all. Seems our Bavarian "state party" seems to be very aloof.....
hoping for the next elections.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Boarischa Krautmo clubWierd Folkersma club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Wierd Folkersma clubI guess it is much more difficult to get those in favor to change their opinion and even reply.
Ruesterstaude club has replied to Boarischa Krautmo clubWierd Folkersma club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Sylvain WiartSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to ColRam clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to cp_u clubInformation society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate.
If upload filters are that expensive that a platform can't survive I doubt that this would be "proportionate". So even if Article 13 stays at it is it is not clear that platforms like ipernity will have to use expensive upload filters.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Guido Werner clubI guess then "...measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate" could be something like the community itself doing the moderation.
So far we have tried to avoid dealing with any difficult copyright infringement cases. If anything, we have said it should be between the legal copyright owner and the one who breaches the copyright.
But if we then start to "wash laundry" together, we may start a "Spanish inquisition". And a lot of time and effort spent on trying to filter the contents based on human opinion.
Machine based filter is equally error prone. But then at least one can blame the machine =D
... I signed the petition (Wikipedia had a link). But statistically 44 % of the people don't understand, what the coming law means. I'm one of the 44%. Article 13 is meant for youtube and other giants - but the filter-idea will kill all the small, tiny platforms, or ???
Ruesterstaude club has replied to Heidiho clubFrom what I have read (and I have to admit that I haven't read that much about this topic) it appears that the proportionality principle is an important part of Article 13. Proportionality means that everybody has to meet a requirement but the way how someone can meet the requirement depends on criterias like size, resources and risk. So tiny platforms like ipernity certainly are not expected to make the same efforts in order to prevent copyright infringements like Google or other internet giants. And I would like to add that Article 13 doesn't require platforms to prevent 100% of copyright infringements. They have to make reasonable efforts to prevent copyright infringements. And what is reasonable certainly is different for Google and ipernity.
Further more I would like to stress that EU directives still need to be implemented in national law. It seems that Article 13 lets some room for interpretation that can lead to different implementations among EU members. Therefore it is probably much too early to accurately assess the precise impact of Article 13.
To be sure I signed 10 times! :-)
Just kidding :-))
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to polytropos clubThat is the problem with such online petitions ;-) So, I don't wonder why some politicians does not take them seriously.
twitter.com/Senficon/status/1110509970213294081
twitter.com/MorawieckiM/status/1110652329609625600 :
We were, we are and we will always be for freedom on the Internet.
All MEPs coming from Poland's ruling party, Law and Justice (PiS), voted against this ACTA2 ruling.
All my MEPs voted against the reform.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Marta Wojtkowska clubMarta Wojtkowska club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubTo become law it has to be approved by a majority of EU countries.
Then it has to be implemented into each individual EU country law.
Implementations may differ... We shall see what happens.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Marta Wojtkowska clubMarta Wojtkowska club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubI am laughing now because two days ago, just after the voting, I explained darknet to my Mom who was (and is) very concerned about this last ruling. She is (almost) 90 years old, but she is an avid Internet user and is able to grasp things better then some politicians. Darknet was new to her though, she wanted to know how it would work. "Just like the underground education in Poland during WWII", I said. "OK, I can do that", said my Mom, who graduated from underground high school, when she was a teenager at that time.
Boarischa Krautmo club has replied to Marta Wojtkowska clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Marta Wojtkowska clubYes, people can have different opinions about dark net as well, but like anything, it may have also positive sides. Just like most of the people think that "hackers" do only bad things. There is actually significant differentiation done in "computer slang":
"Hacker" is so called "white hat" geek who tries to improve things by spotting the loop holes or improving things.
Then "cracker" is someone who does nothing but harm or seeks only personal gain.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_hacker#Classifications
Thank you.
Will comment after will complete reading
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to J. Gafarot clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Treasa Ui CionaodhaOne never knows if there are even some "loopholes" ;-)
The Inconquered.
BTW it is public domain with attribution, so it is OK to put the link here :)
The point is, Polish were and are quite good with highly organized, clandestine operations ;)
And I know some really good hackers, too :)
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Marta Wojtkowska clubSee my fresh addition up there on caption.
And thank you for that extra information, Marta =)
Great composition!
Now, if and when England leaves the EU, do we have to obey this copyright rule!!
Best Wishes, and a good weekend
Peter
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Peter_Private_Box clubNo, you no longer need to obey any EU laws and directives, I think. Meaning that obviously if and when Brexit becomes ratified, England of course has laws of it's own.
But how this new EU copyright directive becomes implemented inside EU is also still open.
And if you refer to ipernity as we, then we supposedly have to follow French laws.
Sign-in to write a comment.