Bedtime
(2) "Du willst mich fotografieren!?"
Wrack in der Elbe (PiP)
Auf dem Weg...
Rusty Structures
"Baustelle"
genagelt
Tree bark
Silk tree blossom
Pommier
Je brumise, tu brumises, il....
Flamands
Scène de "farniente" chez les colverts
Maronen
Curb
Scrap
in blue
Volo via
cuori in vendita
From an inspiration to the implementation
Cold spell
ventaglio di ombre
canadair = incendio
heaven
walk the line
In the city
Devil's Kitchen
verriegelt
Fjällbacka harbour. 201308
Langesjö. End of the season. 201308
knots (pip)
doors
42/50 (PiP)
Green Times
-
n'est pas chameau qui veut
Piste
"Camel"
Hiiiilfe !!!!!!
behütet
13
Désert Blanc
HFF & HFF !
Triangoli
Deutsche Bank
See also...
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
- Photo replaced on 06 Nov 2017
-
573 visits
Dreaming of ...
... white Christmas(?)
High key photography can and should be taken into account already on the shooting settings, and overexpose the image at least +1 EV, or even more! But then especially on digital photography comes the danger of loosing most of the details. Therefore it is maybe a better approach to do the rest on photo editor.
A "good image" should also have a spot of full black and then some pure white. But on a subject like this there are number of problems. There are no really dark areas, and if the background is very white, then the edges of a white subject disappears totally.
Here I did number of things. I first overexposed +1 EV, then did quite much editing on Snapseed software, like adding some white vignetting. But even that did not seem to be enough. So, I had to give the final touch on PicMonkey.
It of course also much depends on the context as well. On a bad computer screen it is not easy to get anything right. And when image becomes viewed against white background, then it becomes obvious if there are no pure white on the image. And vice versa. On black background something that is supposed to be a high key image quite likely looks that way.
On notes I give you some other shots on the topic, to give you the scale and other point of views on this tiny snow globe cupid and its larger companion. These kitsch cupids are great practice targets! And it is like shooting the shooter! =D
Camera details
Camera: Sony Xperia Z1 Compact mobile phone F5321
Exposure: 0.03 sec. (1/32)
Aperture: f/2.0
ISO: 80
Exposure value: +1
Focal Length: 4.2 mm (approximately 35mm equivalent after 1.2 times zooming and cropping)
Lens: External clip on magnifying glass ("macro lens").
For some reason EXIF dropped out during the editing?
High key photography can and should be taken into account already on the shooting settings, and overexpose the image at least +1 EV, or even more! But then especially on digital photography comes the danger of loosing most of the details. Therefore it is maybe a better approach to do the rest on photo editor.
A "good image" should also have a spot of full black and then some pure white. But on a subject like this there are number of problems. There are no really dark areas, and if the background is very white, then the edges of a white subject disappears totally.
Here I did number of things. I first overexposed +1 EV, then did quite much editing on Snapseed software, like adding some white vignetting. But even that did not seem to be enough. So, I had to give the final touch on PicMonkey.
It of course also much depends on the context as well. On a bad computer screen it is not easy to get anything right. And when image becomes viewed against white background, then it becomes obvious if there are no pure white on the image. And vice versa. On black background something that is supposed to be a high key image quite likely looks that way.
On notes I give you some other shots on the topic, to give you the scale and other point of views on this tiny snow globe cupid and its larger companion. These kitsch cupids are great practice targets! And it is like shooting the shooter! =D
Camera details
Camera: Sony Xperia Z1 Compact mobile phone F5321
Exposure: 0.03 sec. (1/32)
Aperture: f/2.0
ISO: 80
Exposure value: +1
Focal Length: 4.2 mm (approximately 35mm equivalent after 1.2 times zooming and cropping)
Lens: External clip on magnifying glass ("macro lens").
For some reason EXIF dropped out during the editing?
Wierd Folkersma, Nora Caracci, .t.a.o.n., ColRam and 26 other people have particularly liked this photo
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Gudrun clubLove this little Angel
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Erika+Manfred clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Erhard Bernstein clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to niraK68 clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Ulrich John clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to LotharW clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Percy Schramm clubThank you and have a nice week, Percy =)
Thanks for your explanation Sami...was difficult for me this week!
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Tanja - Loughcrew clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to protoxSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Chrissy clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to JanSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Cheryl Kelly (cher12…Best wishes, Christien.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Chris10 clubSign-in to write a comment.