16 favorites     24 comments    513 visits

See also...

◉✴ Digital Dreams ✴ ◉✴ Digital Dreams ✴


# Everyone's Photo Pool # # Everyone's Photo Pool #


Experimentations Experimentations


Time For Experiments Time For Experiments


See more...

Keywords

TSC
tsc


Authorizations, license

Visible by: Everyone
All rights reserved

513 visits


Horribly Delirious Retouching...

Horribly Delirious Retouching...
...is what I think of HDR. Although, who am I to judge? I myself have learned to post process photographs heavily, to create something like "personal imaginary landscapes". I suppose it is sort of an escapism.

However, I guess High Dynamic Range editing was first and foremost invented to replicate visual perception in photography. Especially in situations like seen in this picture, the eye adapts way better to differences in amount of light than any camera sensor or film does. So, I very well understand the temptation to do something about it.

After my old camera stopped working, I felt tempted to finally buy a camera, which does things I have dreamed of for decades. I remember when I first time saw incredible 360 degree photographs created with some rotating panorama film camera. Unfortunately at that time all of those special cameras were way too expensive for a common amateur photographer.

Now finally thanks to digital photography and incredible software, somewhat everyone (at least in first world) can afford to buy a camera that does good enough panorama straight on camera. And now those affordable cameras also have dynamic range good enough to stretch the range of tones even within a single image. My current camera offers various methods to increase the dynamic range. I can take multiple shots, which then become combined on camera software. But it also gives an possibility to increase the range of tones within any taken picture, even on panorama images.

Here on top you see a picture taken without any "HDR efffect". In the middle, you see image where I used so called "high dynamic mode". And in the bottom is what I did on GIMP editor, to increase the light on dark areas even more.

Not perfect, I admit, but enough for amateur photographer like me. And what comes to HDR images, I think a good HDR is like a good tapestry: You don't notice it. In other words, in a good HDR image you don't notice there's something done to increase the dynamic range.

Finally one advice how to "dig out" tones on any taken digital image:
luminous-landscape.com/contrast-masking
Similar thing was actually done in lab during the film era:
www.freestylephoto.biz/contrast-masking-the-traditional-print

However, as a result of digital contrast masking cited above, you may get rather "flat" looking pictures. This is why I have learned to again increase the contrasts, like often done in HDR retouching. For that I have found this very good Elsamuko's "National Geographic Script" for GIMP:
sites.google.com/site/elsamuko/gimp/ng

ColRam, Rafael, , and 12 other people have particularly liked this photo


Comments
 autofantasia
autofantasia club
Interesting to see the different results and to read your thoughts on the subject Sami.

My own opinion on HDR for what it's worth is that it is just like any other processing technique - it suits some shots better than others and it is used to great effect by some people and not so effectively by others.

So, for me at least there's no good or bad HDR ... I either like the image or I don't! :)
9 years ago.
 Sami Serola (inactive)
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied
Well, obviously there is no objective good and bad from philosophical point of view. So, only subjective preferences. And like for example Chris successfully managed to show (either intentionally or accidentally), even HDR can be turned into something very artistic (from my personal point of view): www.ipernity.com/doc/christine.bentley/37292408/in/group/305069

However, to be honest, and again from my point of view, for this challenge many chose a subject where there really was no "need" for HDR. In other words, not much differences in light. And subject of mine was super extreme. I should have used multiple exposures, RAW images, and proper software. Although, it would have been damn difficult (or impossible to me) to get three or even five identical but differently lit panorama images.

I'm not sure if people really understood this idea of taking panorama images and then dig out the tones on them. Maybe I should have chosen a better subject where the differences in light were not so extreme.
9 years ago.
 Indycaver (Norm)
Indycaver (Norm) club
Cool series Sami!
9 years ago.
 Karen's Place
Karen's Place club
It's all over my head at this point, but I enjoy reading everyone's thoughts on this and will hopefully learn more as we go along. Thanks Sami for always helping us to look at things in a new way.
9 years ago.
 Sami Serola (inactive)
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied
We all do. I certainly learned to dislike HDR less. In other words, I have almost started to like it... Today sun finally shined, and I took some fabulous on-camera HDR shots. Very mild ones though. The Lumix TZ60 keeps the bracketing rather limited.
9 years ago.

Sign-in to write a comment.