13 favorites     4 comments    63 visits

1/684 f/1.6 5.1 mm ISO 50

Apple iPhone 13

iPhone 13 back dual wide camera 5.1mm f/1.6

EXIF - See more details

See also...


Keywords

10


Authorizations, license

Visible by: Everyone
All rights reserved

63 visits


Zerstörungen stromabwärts von Mariahilf

Zerstörungen stromabwärts von Mariahilf
Auch hier haben wir wieder in der Nachbarschaft einer zerstörten Brücke gewaltige Schäden in der Umgebung. Beim Neubau von Brücken wird man auf Faktoren wie Stabilität, aber auch Höhe oder Durchlässigkeit für große Wassermassen (mit Treibgut) achten müssen.
Translate into English

cammino, Ulrich John, Paolo Tanino, Erhard Bernstein and 9 other people have particularly liked this photo


Comments
 Roger (Grisly)
Roger (Grisly) club
Higher, stronger and more attractive bridges Marco, nice capture
2 years ago.
 Patrick Brandy
Patrick Brandy club
Place au nouvelles constructions tout change bonne journée
2 years ago.
 J.Garcia
J.Garcia club
Terrible weather conditions are being frequent
It's mandatory to think about the future, Marco
2 years ago.
Marco F. Delminho club has replied to J.Garcia club
First we should focus on the past an what went wrong there. I don't know to what degree the media in other countries covered the flood and its aftermath. So let me summarize a few things.

First, we had a fairly rainy spring - I remember I took off the week after Easter and we stayed at home reading most of the time, because the weather was awful. There was a brief sunny period in late May / early June, but the first half of July was again rainier and colder than normal. All that is natural, there is not too much we can do about it. Same goes for the terrain, our valley is rocky (mostly shale), and the soil does not absorb water too well.

However: already five days before the flood, scientist issued alerts about a possibly devastating flood in the Ahr valley. None of that really was brought to the common people's attention. One meteorologist (Sven Plöger, with whom I usually love to disagree...) suggested the regional public broadcaster should use one of their radio channels for a 24 hours a day special so inhabitants of the valleys affected could be warned in advance. The broadcaster turned the idea down.

Then, just hours before the flood, the responsible ministry on state level (The ministry of environment of Rhineland-Palatinate) issued a press release claiming there was no imminent threat of floodings. When the responsible under-secretary (and the minister's right hand man) was told by a subordinate that the press statement was wrong and should be corrected, he refused. During the night of the flood, the responsible minister was apparently incommunicado, after spending the evening having dinner with political friends.

The following morning, as we know from leaked chat messages, the main topic of conversation in the ministry was not how to help the people affected, but how to come up with a wording that would make the minister look better. Briefly after the flood, that minister took her family for a vacation to France - FOR FOUR WEEKS! She got promoted a couple months later, accepting a position in the new national cabinet...

When news about the circumstances spread, she tried to clear herself claiming that the vacation was necessary because her sick husband needed it - her had suffered a stroke three years ago - just as much as her children who were fed up after all those Covid related lockdowns. Need I mention that the minister's party was the most ardent advocate of harsh Covid measures?

So as I said: a lot of reason to look to the recent past and see how we can remedy such things. The material damage I think could not really be avoided - but government failure cost the lifes of over 130 people.
2 years ago. Edited 2 years ago.

Sign-in to write a comment.