You can now decide finely who is allowed to insert images.
The default setting is "All your contacts".
You can change that setting by going to your parameters page / "Photos and other content" section.
[FR] Précédemment, n'importe qui autorisé à ajouter des commentaires dans votre espace avait la possibilité d'insérer des images dans ces commentaires.
Vous pouvez désormais décider finement qui est autorisé à insérer des images.
Le paramètre par défaut est "Tous vos contacts".
Vous pouvez changer ce réglage en vous rendant dans vos paramètres, rubrique "Photos et autres publications".
I´m so over with all these "Seen in this group, admired in the other group" which is spreading this wide recently in all comments if a photo was added to a group.
Could you please, please provide an automated referer-link to every comment which was shown if someone really wants to see this information?
Maybe implemented like the permalinks are provided in comments, so it won´t be displayed all the time in every single comment as text, but provided by ipernity itself if someone is really interested to know from which group an user is comming who has commented a photo.
This would resolve all these additionally "Seen in" - comment - shit in minutes.
If after that still anyone typing (or copying) in this texts anyway it´s no doubt it´s just for spaming and providing some advertisement for a group because the information is already given by ipernity itself´s functions...
It shouldn´t be this complex to read-out the given referer-string by the browser and put it in such a field and it doesn´t work just for groups, it works for everything like userspaces, google, everywhere as long as the browser is providing this information...
What's the mayhem about ?! The inevitable battle of egos ?
Some people do take themselves SO seriously it's frightening ..This is LEISURE ,.. no?
Could you not perhaps discuss your personal issues in private ?
Some of us do not patronize this site to get stressed out..♫♫
Have a nice day ! :-)
Now, having received 30+ group suggestions on one of my photos recently (which took 60+ clicks to get rid of, mind you), I can certainly fit that into the definition of spam.... However, it's a better compromise than leaving those who want their groups to function like communities such an incredibly limited way of recruiting new members. There is nothing wrong with group members wanting to increase membership and activity in groups they belong to.
Most of the old running groups who are founded six years ago are running in this "all users are equal" - style, at least as long until some people are joining ipernity which seemed to be have some other suggestions how to drive a group and tend to be acting like if they are gods just because they´d founded a group - they don´t want participation like this because they can´t deal with users which are at the same level like theirself.
At least after being a part in this discussion it seems to be clear that it depends by the members of the given group if the group is working with hundrets of administrators or moderators this nice. I suggest if some of the guys who are discussing here will join the team with their destructive attitude the groups won´t last pretty longer without causing some trouble because the additions by others would be get spammed instead of discussed and the group-rules would changed to by adding some "additional comment-code" to the group.
After reading the first answer at my suggestion it seemed to be clear that it wasn´t to inform the photograph where they came from to use their comment codes, it´s just for advertise their groups otherwise they won´t have any problem _where_ this information is provided as long it is.
Sign-in to write a comment.