[de] [eo] [fr]

On the Art of Governing

Part 2


The Bishop of Rome has emerged as the winner

of the almost 1700-year long religious wars.



- perhaps -


'Losers' were among others

- perhaps -

the Orthodox Church – 11th century
the Vaudois – 12th century
the Cathari - Albigensians – 12th century
the Huguenots – 16th century
the Anglican Church – 16th century
the Protestants – 16th century
the Old Catholics – 19th century
the Liberation Theology of South America
in the 20th century


With the result that:
today, Catholic bishops all over the world
are simply heelers and yes-men.
" Yes - Holy Father - yes "

As rumour has it
- sometimes ignominious -
the Curia is responsible
for this overbearing attention.


But - once
in their Episcopal life,

the cardinals appointed by the Pope
- of which the majority are traditionalists -
are allowed to use their right to vote
and elect a new Pope from within their circle
as their commander-in-chief.

And here their power comes to an end again.

They are actually voting for their
- own lack of power in the future –

This transition of power is unparalleled

? How much longer will the electors put up with this?
? For how long will they continue
to play this game to their disadvantage?
? And ultimately to the grave disadvantage of their believers?


A miracle would happen
they wouldn’t

elect a Pope.


We today know
and have often supposed that
even the Pope is – in many respects –

at the mercy of his court – the Curia.
Yet bit by bit, these power games trickle through.

Imagine



? Where would Jesus of Nazareth sit ?
With a red or even white robe
a white mitre on his head and red shoes on his feet
? In a huge cathedral ?

An unrealistic thought:

? If this Jesus had climbed up the hierarchical ladder

until he was a Cardinal,
Would he let himself

be elected as a Pope,
a Holy Father?


From the New Testament – Matthew 23.9 and 10
9. And do not call anyone on earth 'father,'
10. for you have one Father, and he is in heaven.



Translation by Tamara Girke