| Latest discussions |
|---|
|
The freedom to photograph cops at risk?
Updated 12 months ago |
|
Government to re-examine anti-terror guidance
Updated 18 months ago |
|
Photorights.org
Updated 18 months ago 1 reply |
| Seems its not just the UK... |
|
Harassed taking photos?
Updated 19 months ago 1 reply |
|
Innocent photographer or terrorist?
Updated 19 months ago 4 replies |
|
Shooters beware: the risk of taking photos in a post-9/11 world
Updated 19 months ago 2 replies |
|
Austin Mitchell MP Early Day Motion condemning police action against lawful photography
Updated 19 months ago |
|
Home Office Minister reasserts photographers' rights
Updated 19 months ago |
|
Seems its not just the UK...posted by
Posted on Wednesday April 23, 2008 at 10:20.
300 visits. (
permalink
)
|
"Members of the Commonwealth Press Union's (CPU) media freedom committee today warned that the bill risked stifling the media's right to cover crime scenes.
CPU chairman Tim Pankhurst said clauses that allowed police extremely wide discretion to close roads near crime scenes were too broad and were open to abuse by officers who wanted to keep the media out.
Police already had enough powers to protect crime scenes.
Mr Pankhurst, editor of The Dominion Post, said many police already failed to follow police general instructions relating to crime scene cordons and were overzealous in keeping media out.
In some cases police singled out reporters and photographers from other members of the public and told them they were not allowed near.
"We would like police procedure to acknowledge and give greater emphasis to the crucial and legitimate role the media plays in a democracy - it acts as the public's eyes and ears."
He said the mainstream media's existing rights should be recognised explicitly in either the bill or in police general instructions."
You must be logged on to post a reply. Sign in now?
Latest comments
–
Subscribe to the comment feed for this topic.