Latest discussions
The freedom to photograph cops at risk?
Updated 12 months ago
Government to re-examine anti-terror guidance
Updated 18 months ago
Photorights.org
Updated 18 months ago
1 reply
Seems its not just the UK...
Updated 18 months ago
Harassed taking photos?
Updated 18 months ago
1 reply
Innocent photographer or terrorist?
Updated 18 months ago
4 replies
Shooters beware: the risk of taking photos in a post-9/11 world
Updated 18 months ago
2 replies
Austin Mitchell MP Early Day Motion condemning police action against lawful photography
Home Office Minister reasserts photographers' rights
Updated 18 months ago

Austin Mitchell MP Early Day Motion condemning police action against lawful photography

posted by A fotdmike
Posted on Sunday April 20, 2008 at 01:06. 283 visits. ( permalink )
From One Eye on the Road

"A Labour MP (Mitchell, Austin) has tabled an Early Day Motion (EDM) in the House of Commons condemning police action against lawful photography in public places.

His EDM reads as such:

That this House is concerned to encourage the spread and enjoyment of photography as the most genuine and accessible people’s art; deplores the apparent increase in the number of reported incidents in which the police, police community support officers (PCSOs) or wardens attempt to stop street photography and order the deletion of photographs or the confiscation of cards, cameras or film on various specious ground such as claims that some public buildings are strategic or sensitive, that children and adults can only be photographed with their written permission, that photographs of police and PCSOs are illegal, or that photographs may be used by terrorists; points out that photography in public places and streets is not only enjoyable but perfectly legal; regrets all such efforts to stop, discourage or inhibit amateur photographers taking pictures in public places, many of which are in any case festooned with closed circuit television cameras; and urges the Home Office and the Association of Chief Police Officers to agree on a photography code for the information of officers on the ground, setting out the public’s right to photograph public places thus allowing photographers to enjoy their hobby without officious interference or unjustified suspicion."

You must be logged on to post a reply. Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the comment feed for this topic.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...