| Latest discussions |
|---|
|
New proposal / Nouvelle proposition / Neuer Vorschlag / Nova propono
Updated 5 weeks ago 37 replies |
|
filtering ... for whom?
Updated 16 months ago 23 replies |
|
Its My Space!!!
Updated 16 months ago 3 replies |
|
Et pour ceux qui ne comprennent pas l'anglais ?
Updated 21 months ago 23 replies |
|
Et une photo d'un tableau de Courbet ?
Updated 21 months ago 49 replies |
|
Help with discussion-tran slation
Updated 21 months ago 23 replies |
|
A slightly different approach to the subject
Updated 21 months ago 6 replies |
|
Let's move faster (if you allow me...)
Updated 21 months ago 6 replies |
| Age verification vs. content filtering |
|
Age Verification / Reliability of Filtering [repost from blog reply]
Updated 21 months ago 5 replies |
| ... view all the discussions |
|
Age verification vs. content filteringposted by -mcbPosted on Saturday January 19, 2008 at 11:17. 486 visits. ( permalink ) |
You must be logged on to post a reply. Sign in now?
Latest comments
–
Subscribe to the comment feed for this topic.
Jan Popelka says:
If I can dare to forget the law I suppose the classification could be done by all users - each could classify a photo e.g. as red while maybe for others the same photo would be green etc. Kind of extending the "favorites" system. As I still believe most Ipernity users are reasonable people the average classification would have its importance - and those "exceptional" users could adapt themselves by selecting different filtering level than usual to achieve the same subjective harmlessness (e.g. switch it off, that is what I would do, or to filter everything so not a single picture would be displayed - that is what should some parents do:).
Filtering
default filtering should be off or asked upon registration higly visible (how many users are able to find a hidden setting during their first days on Ipernity!) . Reliable age verification cannot be done without serious troubles and inconveniencies for the users, I am pretty sure on this. Is this really what the French law insist on?! If default filtering is on and to turn it off the newbie-user has to do something (find a setting, or even provide personal data and wait for verification) then it IS censorship from my point of view (as those users will not see immediately and without effort what I wanna show them - btw it is not an erected pennis nor a vivisected animal and as has already been stated there are "better" sites for this kind of pictures, freely accessible).
On the other hand I understand Ipernity striving for conformity with law. But please not over-exaggerated! And if the law is so strict (it seems to be strict - search google for "enculer" and then do the same search using some french "moteur-recherche"...) then I would suggest moving the servers and business abroad - it is not a problem today, is it?). This solution cannot be used:
fr.altavista.com/web/results?itag=ody&q=enculer&kgs=1&kls=0 ?
Jan Popelka edited this reply 21 months ago.
-mcb replies:
Jan Popelka says: