| Latest discussions |
|---|
|
New proposal / Nouvelle proposition / Neuer Vorschlag / Nova propono
Updated 27 hours ago 47 replies |
|
filtering ... for whom?
Updated 17 months ago 23 replies |
|
Its My Space!!!
Updated 17 months ago 3 replies |
|
Et pour ceux qui ne comprennent pas l'anglais ?
Updated 22 months ago 23 replies |
|
Et une photo d'un tableau de Courbet ?
Updated 22 months ago 49 replies |
|
Help with discussion-tran slation
Updated 22 months ago 23 replies |
|
A slightly different approach to the subject
Updated 22 months ago 6 replies |
|
Let's move faster (if you allow me...)
Updated 22 months ago 6 replies |
|
Age verification vs. content filtering
Updated 22 months ago 4 replies |
|
Age Verification / Reliability of Filtering [repost from blog reply]
Updated 22 months ago 5 replies |
| ... view all the discussions |
|
Moderation policyposted by
Posted on Thursday January 17, 2008 at 19:12.
250 visits. (
permalink
)
|
Our first thinking:
Rules
- Registered visitors (members) can report rating problems to ipernity moderators.
- ipernity moderators can restrict/lock contents rates, suspend/remove illegal contents and alert/suspend/remove faulty members.
You must be logged on to post a reply. Sign in now?
This topic has been closed by Team ipernity.
Latest comments
–
Subscribe to the comment feed for this topic.
Charp pro says:
And a possibility to forewarn members that their ratings are not approved when the decision is not obvious (by obvious, I mean a "red" content rated as green, for example)?
Charp pro replies:
Iljuschin pro says:
Iljuschin pro replies:
Sophie@ipernity pro replies:
I know you, as a german user, have been shocked by F***kr behaviour, but please, keep your mind open regarding 'filtering possibilities", which are useful for families, for example.
--
Seen in a group discussion (?)
manganite says:
--
Seen in a group discussion (?)
The current discussion is closed and redirected to this new post.