| Latest discussions |
|---|
|
Alexander Rodchenko
Updated 8 months ago 5 replies |
| Technique: Conversion to B&W |
|
B+W Conversion
Updated 20 months ago 2 replies |
|
Old Timer
Updated 21 months ago 14 replies |
|
Everyday scenes: Store windows
Updated 21 months ago 5 replies |
|
one of my absolute favorites
Updated 22 months ago 5 replies |
|
Oily Hands
Updated 22 months ago 11 replies |
|
Discussion
Updated 22 months ago 4 replies |
|
Categories of Photographs
Updated 22 months ago 9 replies |
|
Critique group remains
Updated 22 months ago 1 reply |
| ... view all the discussions |
|
Technique: Conversion to B&Wposted by
Posted on Friday July 18, 2008 at 03:00.
137 visits. (
permalink
)
|
You must be logged on to post a reply. Sign in now?
Latest comments
–
Subscribe to the comment feed for this topic.
I have used mainly channel mixer, and have downloaded a suggestion for replicating different films. However, even when working with raw files, I find I suffer very badly with banding and pixelation when working on sky's. I usually apply a small amount of noise reduction for this but still frustrates me.
I love using Duo tone for the colouring of my work, find it replicates the toning process of traditional prints well as it works on certain parts of the image and that I can control these parts. The only down side is that I find different results on different monitors, despite using a pantone reference chart for my colour choice.
If anyone can get it, Black and White Photography magazine had a great article on B+W conversion and suggested using the unsharp mask for contrast control. Results worked very well and could be employed locally or all over the image.
Midwesternstock © pro says: