Rollfilm / Discussions

220 film has no backing paper either. Pity you probably don't even know what it is.

Wikipedia is poor's people encyclopedia. It does not have any authority on anything. Relying on it is like stating: "This is true because my cousin states so!"

I do spool my 35 mm on 120 take up spools, unlike our friend Kommaasser.

Why don't you take and post photos, instead of just arguing? :-)

hi!
in this case i´ve to support nils. just read the group description:

"object of this group: rollfilm works / medium format photography. show us the cream of analog photography!"

definition of rollfilm is - we don´t need wiki - 120 or 220 rolls, negative formate from 4,5x6 or larger.
to my mind sprocket holes is inbetween, a special case.
i accept them, because it´s a great technique, but they should not flood the pool. i didn´t post my sprocket holes here too.

in past i didn´t delete some pure 35mm pics too. my thought about: every member has the right to discus it here, i´m not a deleting dictator!

peaceful christmas all around,
martin

OK, I will remove them, it doesn't really matter to me.

--
Seen in a group discussion (?)

I really don't realize that rollfilm means 120/220 rollfilm, in my mind it is every film that is rolled.
Anyway, if it isn't permitted I just remove them.
Thanks for explaining.

it´s not about permition....
;)
thanks for your quick reaction!
and as i told above, it´s been just a hint.
whish you a nice evening, mila!

greetings all around,
martin