Bokeh - the blurry way of photography / Discussions

Latest discussions
new Bokeh with Mamiya Sekor C 80mm f1.9
Updated 3 days ago
Bokeh with Canon EF 50/1,4
Updated 9 days ago
5 replies
Bokeh with Mamiya Sekor C 80mm f2.8
Updated 6 weeks ago
We are hiring! Searching for group moderators
Updated 2 months ago
Check if your photo qualifies for Bokeh
Bokeh with Samyang/Falcon/ Walimex 85/1,4
Updated 2 months ago
Bokeh with the Sigma EX 105mm f/2.8 DG Macro
Updated 2 months ago
5 replies
Bokeh with Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 Mark II
Updated 3 months ago
9 replies
Bokeh with Pentax FA 31/1.8 Limited
Updated 3 months ago
7 replies
Bokeh with Pentax FA 43/1.9 Limited
Updated 3 months ago
12 replies
... view all the discussions

Check if your photo qualifies for Bokeh

posted by A Doomshammer
Posted on Monday September 24, 2007 at 20:44. 1 004 visits. ( permalink )
As some users are a little uncertain about if there photo is a bokeh-shot and qualifies for this group, this discussion thread is ment as a "Post it or not?"-Zone.

You do not have to post your photos here, before posting into the group, it just for users that aren't sure if their pics qualify.

Please leave your photo in this thread- even if you get a "doesn't fit". This gives other members the possibility to have kinda educational informations (possitive and negative).

Hopefully this will help to keep the pool filled with only the finest bokeh here at Ipernity :-)

(Post a maximum of 3 pics in a row at medium size only please)

Have fun!
Winni

This topic has been edited by Doomshammer 2 years ago.

30 Replies

Paŭl Peeraerts pro says:
OK. I'm the first one!

Dwergotter (Amblonyx cinereus)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
Paul, nice shot. Although only slightly, this shot qualifies w/o objection :)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Fly says:
and I'm the second, third and fourth ;)


Geländer

MG 2755
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
These are as well very nice examples of bokeh :-)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Roberto Ballerini - traveling pro says:
After reading your explaination, I tried my self to apply them on some of my shots: can these qualify as bokeh?
"Bokeh I" by Roberto Ballerini <away> [?]
Bokeh I by Roberto Ballerini <away>
"Bokeh II" by Roberto Ballerini <away> [?]
Bokeh II by Roberto Ballerini <away>
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
Roberto, w/o looking at the "large" version, I can tell you that these are two awesome examples of Bokeh. Nice work :)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Roberto Ballerini - traveling pro replies:
Thank you very much
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
tossthecam says:
Not sure bokeh or just DOF
metal:14out of science:04
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
The first qualifies, the second rather not.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
tuvalu pro says:
Since I altered the contrast and saturation of this picture quite a lot I wonder if this still qualifies as a bokeh-shot for this group.

Winteräpfel

And no, I didn't paint anything or used unsharp masks or any such things.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
To me it's absolutelly bokeh.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
tuvalu pro replies:
Great, thanks.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Paŭl Peeraerts pro says:
Bokeh or DoF?
Kartoffelrose am Strand
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
Hi Paul, though the blur is a bit harsh (so the amount of bokeh is a little bit slighter) this will qualify as bokeh shot.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
grey_hound_49 pro says:
bokeh? Taken with Sigma 70mm Macro
colours of summer -4-
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
Absolutelly :)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Pascal H. says:
Remove before take off

Sorry but i'm not sure to understand what is the difference between bokeh and DoF... i'm going to browse through this group to find my answer :)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
There is slight bokeh in that shot- but a little bit too less for this group :)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Dirk pro says:
Sommer 2007 (summer ’07) by Dirk Sohler

--
Coming from the Bokeh group home page (?)
Posted 23 months ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
Absolutely!!
Posted 23 months ago. ( permalink )
Dirk pro replies:
*happy*

Added. :)

--
Coming from the Bokeh group home page (?)
Posted 23 months ago. ( permalink )
sisah says:
Elfenkrokusse der Sonne entgegen
What about this photo?
Posted 21 months ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
The photo definately has some bokeh. Even though the "sharp" section in this picture is bigger, this photo would qualify.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )
Antonio Dell'elce says:
A night at the Gianicolo

Bokeh!? Maybe.. but the an unusual "reverse" bokeh shot probably :)

--
Coming from a group home page (?)
Posted 20 months ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
Absolutely! Interessting composition.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink / translate )
Yan says:
How about these?



Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )
Yan edited this reply 2 months ago.
Anne Seltmann pro replies:
Click on the magnifying glass below the image when you see the HTML code. Copier him paste it into posts. Behind the HTML code you still need to send a signal, otherwise it does not work
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )
Yan replies:
Ah, cool, thank you!
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )
A Doomshammer replies:
Yes, slightly. The bokeh in the background is there, but it does not match with the 1/5 group rules. Anyways very nice shot!
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

You must be logged on to post a reply. Sign in now?

rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the comment feed for this topic.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...