Anton Hazewinkel Uploaded on October 26, 2009
by Anton Hazewinkelpro

Keyword tags

Censorship
Social
Networking
User
Censor
Generated

More information

This doc is public
All rights reserved
  1. Taken on Monday October 26th, 2009 at 19:31
  2. View Exif properties of this photo
  3. View all sizes
  4. Download the original file
  5. 60 visits

User Generated Censorship 


A strange experience I had yesterday. I was blocked by another user for the first time in all the years on Flickr.
Why? Because I posted a comment on this picture:
www.flickr.com/photos/cosmicsausage/4041230095/
saying that is was indeed a great subject but politely added a statement that in my opinion post-processing a portrait of a person with such a tarnished skin with a 100+ clarity setting and other settings to exploit his skin features was in my view too much. For those of you who don't know these settings: it's the kind of setting that would even make a model look like in need of a dermatologist.

I was about to forget this event, but it has some interesting angels.

I think most of us who like street photography or making portraits in general face dilemmas from time to time as to how far we are allowed to intrude privacy and expose portrayed people, especially when the capture maybe not all that flattering. Debates or exchanges of opinion on this are useful and, with the ever shrinking space of privacy in the online world, inevitable for many years to come.

The second angle, equally interesting to me, is censorship. Not new is that governments, companies and institutions try to limit or control the freedom of speech and freedom of exchange. Living in China, I experience this every day, especially online.

I think most people agree that the ever growing control over our online identities is something to worry about, or at least something to keep a close eye on. This example shows another appearance of upcoming censorship, enabled by features offered by social networking sites. If you don't want to hear certain opinions, you just censor them. Something Orwell could not think of, but social networking sites allow every individual to become a "Big Brother" and exercise censorship ...
In this case it is just a simple user, but I remember having read comments in photostreams of one of the Flickr "stars" were mild criticism was beaten down, while ignoring the points made in the comment, supported with cheers from crowds of fans.

It seems that social networks not only thrive on user generated content. User generated censorship is something to watch for the future ...

6 Comments / add your comment?

Merodemapro says:
hmm, I was a f***r-member from the very beginning, and ever since they moved their servers from canada to the us (and became property of yahoo) freedom declined rapidly and trouble started - whole streams were erased because of one pubic hair etc etc - there were crews of self-appointed vigilantes roaming f***r and flagging other people down...

up to now ipernity seems pretty relaxed

and you are right the amount of privacy in a world where every telephone has a camera seems shrinking by the day - my criterium is usually the answer to the question "if it were the person I loved most, would I mind if it was made public?"

(nice too is Godwin's Law)
Posted 4 weeks ago. ( permalink )
Anton Hazewinkelpro says:
agree

(thanks for the link, interesting reading)
Posted 4 weeks ago. ( permalink )
Siegfried Vogel says:
I agree with your thoughts, Anton. Social control is the best way to prohibit the publication of all opinions and views.
BTW, are you aware, that your own remark about "too much exploition of skin defects" was - in the widest sense - part of social control, too? Every feedback is...
Posted 3 weeks ago. ( permalink )
Anton Hazewinkelpro says:
Siegfried, I think there is a big difference between a debate, where opposite opinions are exchanged and discussed, and censorship (i.e. blocking different opinions). When such debates are banned or excluded, "narrow mindedness" will flourish ...
Posted 3 weeks ago. ( permalink / translate )
Siegfried Vogel replies:
Of course there is a big difference between the two! Nobody needs censorship when social control mechanisms are strong enough. Its rather easy to implant a moral code into the masses. Do that, and you can watch the people doing self-censorship...
Posted 3 weeks ago. ( permalink )
Merodemapro replies:
if it were that easy no police (or, in the cased of f***r, moral troopers) would be needed by those who did the planting; you have a point though
Posted 3 weeks ago. ( permalink )

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to comments on this doc.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...