Keywords

eth 321
uop eth 321 new assignments
uop eth 321 new tutorials
uop eth 321 new week 6
uop eth 321 new week 5
uop eth 321 new week 4
uop eth 321 new week 3
uop eth 321 new week2
uop eth 321 new week 1
uop eth 321 new entire course
uop eth 321 new complete course
uop eth 321 new
eth 321 help


Authorizations, license

Visible by: Everyone
All rights reserved

10 visits

UOP ETH 321 Week 3 Knowledge Check NEW


UOP ETH 321 Week 3 Knowledge Check NEW Sign-in to download this doc.
Not registered yet?

UOP ETH 321 Week 3 Knowledge Check NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
www.assignmentclick.com/eth-321-new/eth-321-week-3-knowledge-check
1 In which case is an offer irrevocable?
When the offeree has not made any preparations before accepting the offer
When the offeree has partly acted upon the offer
When the offer is not in the form of an option contract
When the offeree’s response contradicts the offer even minimally

2 What does the mailbox rule, in the context of common law contracts, state?
An offeror cannot revoke his or her offer under any circumstance.
An offeror must receive a written document of acceptance by the offeree in order for an offer to be considered accepted.
An offeree is said to have accepted an offer as soon as he or she dispatches the acceptance
An offeree can use any method of acceptance, even if it has not been specified by the offeror.

3 Which of the following meets the consideration requirement of contracts?
When a promiser pledges to perform a legal duty
When a promisee gives up a legal right
When a promiser gifts a property of high value to someone
When a promisee provides a gift for a favor done in the past

4 When does fraudulent misrepresentation occur in the context of contracts?
When one party to a contract unintentionally fails to notice an error in the express terms of the contract
When one party to a contract knowingly provides only puffing and not facts in the contract
When one party to a contract knowingly distorts a material fact in the contract
When one party to a contract unintentionally conceals one of the facts in the terms of the contract

5 Mr. Sanchez is a 70 year old man with Parkinson’s disease. Jennifer, a full time nurse, has been taking care of him for over four years. Mr. Sanchez depends on Jennifer and considers her to be a trustworthy caregiver. However, Jennifer informs Mr. Sanchez that she can no longer be his caregiver unless he promises to leave his estate to her in his will. Since Mr. Sanchez does not have anyone else to care for him, he accepts this agreement. Under which condition would a court of law allow Mr. Sanchez to void this agreement?
Fraudulent misrepresentation
Slander

For more classes visit

www.assignmentclick.com

Comments

Sign-in to write a comment.