Keywords

uop
crt 205 week 9
crt 205 week 8
crt 205 week 7
crt 205 week 6
crt 205 week 5
crt 205 week 4
crt 205 week 3
crt 205 week 2
crt 205 week 1
uop crt 205 complete course
uop crt 205
crt 205
uop crt 205 entire course tutorials


Authorizations, license

Visible by: Everyone
All rights reserved

3 visits

UOP CRT 205 Week 8 DQ 1 And DQ 2


UOP CRT 205 Week 8 DQ 1 And DQ 2 This doc cannot be viewed.

UOP CRT 205 Week 8 DQ 1 And DQ 2

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

www.assignmentclick.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-8-dq-1-and-dq-2

For more classes visit
www.assignmentclick.com

DQ 1 - Describe a time when your moral values influenced the way you responded to an issue. What differences did you notice between your logical reasoning process and your moral reasoning process? What were the possible consequences or outcomes of your decision?
DQ 2 - State your stance on the Terri Schiavo case, and identify the moral value judgment that influenced you to choose your stance.
An example of a stance is, •Terri Schiavo should have been allowed to live, despite her persistent vegetative state.– An example of a moral value judgment is, •No person’s death should be decided by another—people should die naturally.
An example of moral relativism could be that American culture accepts many religious standpoints, making it difficult for its citizens to agree on the religious morality of the issue brought to light by Terri Schiavo and her family.
Moore and Parker (2007) define utilitarianism as the belief that •…if an individual can feel pleasure and pain, then he or she deserves moral consideration (p. 425). Consider that many proponents of both sides of the Shiavo case thought they had Terri’s best interests in mind—a moral consideration.
Discuss with your classmates how moral relativism and utilitarianism apply to this issue.

Comments