Keywords

mgmt 520
keller mgmt 520 week 6
mgmt 520 help
mgmt 520 assignments
keller mgmt 520 week 5
keller mgmt 520 week 4
keller mgmt 520 week 3
keller mgmt 520 week 2
keller mgmt 520 week 1
keller mgmt 520 tutorials
keller mgmt 520 final exam
keller mgmt 520 entire course
keller mgmt 520
keller mgmt 520 complete course


Authorizations, license

Visible by: Everyone
All rights reserved

3 visits

KELLER MGMT 520 Week 6 You Decide


KELLER MGMT 520 Week 6 You Decide This doc cannot be viewed.

KELLER MGMT 520 Week 6 You Decide


Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

www.assignmentclick.com/mgmt-520/mgmt-520-week-6-you-decide-es

For more classes visit
www.assignmentclick.com
eddy’s Supplies’ CEO has asked you to advise him on the facts of the case and your opinion of their potential liability. He wants to settle the case. Write a memo to him that states your view of whether the company is exposed to liability on all issues you feel are in play. Include in your memo any laws that apply and any precedent cases either for or against Teddy’s case that impact liability. Include in the memo your suggested “offer of settlement” to Virginia. Back up your offer using your analysis of the case against Teddy’s.Virginia Pollard worked as a cashier and clerk for Teddy’s Supplies, a family-owned chain of film production equipment supply stores in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. During a routine performance evaluation, Virginia’s supervisor at Teddy’s complained that she made too many personal phone calls when she worked in the West Orange store. The supervisor noted this on Virginia’s annual review, and warned her to keep personal calls to a bare minimum while at work. Soon thereafter, Teddy transferred Pollard to guard film equipment in the main warehouse behind the storefront; Virginia couldn’t make personal calls there, and her work became exemplary. Her performance evaluation three months after her transfer was “meeting expectations” with no negative comments
The circuit court overturned the decision of the NJ Human Rights Commission that had found that Pollard was the victim of sexual harassment and disparate treatment. Please answer these questions
The CEO asks you to review the sexual harassment policy currently in place that Virginia signed. He wants you to provide him with suggestions for changes to it. Review the policy and give three recommendations for changes, enhancements, and ideas for making the policy stronger. Include your reasons for these suggestions. If you find information online for making these changes, include citations and/or links to that information. Explain how your suggestions may have protected Teddy’s in this case. Support these recommendations with current case law.

How would Pollard’s case be impacted if her replacement had been a female? Would her case be different? Would her damages be different? Explain your answer.

Comments