See also...
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Certain people including you -
All rights reserved
- Photo replaced on 26 Sep 2018
-
1 467 visits
Stop picture theft
with PiP
Arrêtez le vol de photos et le marketing non autorisé, car cela aura de graves conséquences.
Detener el robo de imágenes y la comercialización no autorizada, ya que tendrá graves consecuencias.
Stop de beelddiefstal en de ongeoorloofde marketing, omdat dit ernstige gevolgen zal hebben.
Stop den Bilderklau und die unerlaubte Vermarktung, da es ernsthafte Konsequenzen haben wird.
Fermare il furto di immagini e il marketing non autorizzato, in quanto avrà gravi conseguenze.
Zatrzymaj kradzież obrazu i nieautoryzowany marketing, ponieważ będzie to miało poważne konsekwencje.
Addressed to image search engines such as Yandex and all Internet users who unauthorizedly copy, store, edit, distribute and/or commercially use worldwide copyrighted pictures (and/or texts) of any kind.
Copyright infringements aren't a trivial offense, and silence doesn't lead to the desired success.
○ ○ ○
Please note here as well:
IMA NEWSFLASH Feb. 10, 2018 / 10. Feb. 2018
About Copyright
http://www.ipernity.com/blog/team/4693794❗️
○ ○ ○
30 July 2018
Another possible help for members who are violated by copyright or licensing infringements is a link inserted by Bergfex/Bernhard (ima) in his comment today, ggr-law.com/urheberrecht/faq/bilderklau-und-fotoklau-im-internet-was-kann-man-dagegen-tun.
Many thanks, Bernhard!
Translate into English
Arrêtez le vol de photos et le marketing non autorisé, car cela aura de graves conséquences.
Detener el robo de imágenes y la comercialización no autorizada, ya que tendrá graves consecuencias.
Stop de beelddiefstal en de ongeoorloofde marketing, omdat dit ernstige gevolgen zal hebben.
Stop den Bilderklau und die unerlaubte Vermarktung, da es ernsthafte Konsequenzen haben wird.
Fermare il furto di immagini e il marketing non autorizzato, in quanto avrà gravi conseguenze.
Zatrzymaj kradzież obrazu i nieautoryzowany marketing, ponieważ będzie to miało poważne konsekwencje.
Addressed to image search engines such as Yandex and all Internet users who unauthorizedly copy, store, edit, distribute and/or commercially use worldwide copyrighted pictures (and/or texts) of any kind.
Copyright infringements aren't a trivial offense, and silence doesn't lead to the desired success.
○ ○ ○
Please note here as well:
IMA NEWSFLASH Feb. 10, 2018 / 10. Feb. 2018
About Copyright
http://www.ipernity.com/blog/team/4693794❗️
○ ○ ○
30 July 2018
Another possible help for members who are violated by copyright or licensing infringements is a link inserted by Bergfex/Bernhard (ima) in his comment today, ggr-law.com/urheberrecht/faq/bilderklau-und-fotoklau-im-internet-was-kann-man-dagegen-tun.
Many thanks, Bernhard!
©UdoSm, Günter Klaus, Eric Desjours, and 58 other people have particularly liked this photo
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Marie-claire Gallet* ઇઉ * club has replied to Erika Akire clubC'est en tous cas indigne !
* ઇઉ * club has replied to ThérèseEveryone can do as I do also something against picture and/or text theft - if he/she really wants.
Thérèse has replied to * ઇઉ * clubMerci d'essayer de protéger nos images.
Bon retour au job, ma chère :)
* ઇઉ * club has replied to ThérèseAlthough the theft cannot be completely prevented, some measures can make an image rather unattractive for thieves. Finally, there's the legal way: action for injunction, action for damages, etc.. However, institutions that systematically and contrary to better knowledge violate copyrights justify the suspicion that they do so in order to obtain the personal data of the injured parties since the data trade is significantly more lucrative for them than the illegally used image/s.
I really do have a lot of understanding, but like you, I don't understand people or institutions that get rich at the expense of others, because in the end, they harm even themselves.
Yes, my Internet connection is working again, and I'm happy to be able to be here again. Thank you for your kind regards after my return, Thérèse. :)
Thérèse has replied to * ઇઉ * clubbiz
Admired in:
www.ipernity.com/group/tolerance
neira-Dan club has replied to Gisela Plewe club* ઇઉ * club has replied to Gisela Plewe clubIf you're publishing a new album and it's mainly for your ipernity friends, wouldn't an appropriate setting for sharing be a solution for you?
Gudrun club has replied to * ઇઉ * club* ઇઉ * club has replied to Gudrun clubThis was my suggestion when ipernity was still ipernity S.A. and was headed by Christophe R.. At that time he promised to implement my proposal or request. Unfortunately, this didn't happen anymore. Maybe ima can set it up sometime - when there's enough money left.
Gisela Plewe club has replied to * ઇઉ * clubDas erwähnte Album hat inzwischen 55 Besucher, von denen nach wie vor nur 5 ip-Mitglieder sind. Meine Bilder sind mit viel Aufwand individualisiert, und da stört mich eine solche Entwicklung schon! Bei Postkartenmotiven ist es mir dagegen nicht so wichtig, weil solche Bilder keine eigene Handschgrift zeigen.
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Gisela Plewe club* ઇઉ * club has replied to GerdaThere it' s a real benefit seeing a proper and so also exemplary observance of copyright and the implementation of license regulations when using foreign material, as with you.
* ઇઉ * club has replied to RHH* ઇઉ * club has replied to Gudrun club* ઇઉ * club has replied to tiabunna clubWatermarks, whether superficial or invisible or copyright notices, are in fact no obstacle for thieves - neither inside nor outside ipernity. A modest protection in our own hands is, as mentioned above, the reduction of image size and resolution to make our own images less attractive to picture thieves. But of course, even this doesn't deter institutions or people who think everything that's possible is also allowed and interpret internationally applicable laws as they please. However, in the end their arrogance doesn't pay off, for there is no cause without effect.
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Ecobird club* ઇઉ * club has replied to Leo W clubggr-law.com/urheberrecht/faq/bilderklau-und-fotoklau-im-internet-was-kann-man-dagegen-tun
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Bergfex clubIs the law firm internationally active? But okay, everyone concerned can check that for him/herself.
During my work for the group "Ipernity Frontpage & What's Hot!" I've just found again an ipernity member, who suggests foreign pictures as own, " © All rights reserved", without attributing the true source and the true author... Cheeky and incredible - but unfortunately true.
At this point, I'd like to point out again the possibility to report such pictures. In the lower right next to "Authorizations, license" is to read "Report as inappropriate". Images that don't comply with ipernity's rules, copyright and licensing terms, etc., can be reported there. However, one should insert clear references such as the link to the respective original in order to make the infringement verifiable for the ima team.
Another possibility is to inform the true author of the obvious violation of his copyright by another Internet user (here, ipernity user). Everything else is then in the hands of the infringed party (Here again, insert the link, but this time to the stolen picture).
Uli F. club has replied to Bergfex club* ઇઉ * club has replied to Uli F. clubThere are several image search engines - with different advantages and disadvantages - that you can integrate as an add-on into your browser, for example, Firefox. I myself work with several in parallel to have the highest possible security. One option would be "Who stole my pictures?", for example (it's one of the most well known). Not used by me personally, but contains several well-known image search engines.
Select one of your images, right-click on it, select the desired search engine in the window that opens and click left. At "Who stole my pictures?" you can also open all search engines simultaneously. It also offers further options.
If one of your images has actually been stolen, you will find out using at least one of these search engines.
Uli F. club has replied to * ઇઉ * clubI thank you very much for your answer and the explanations. I'll try it!
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Uli F. clubHowever, I hope you both don't resent me for having replied in his place, because here in my gallery - as well as elsewhere - I'd like to sensitize for this important ongoing theme.
Good luck to you.
* ઇઉ * club has replied to RHHRHH has replied to * ઇઉ * clubmais il est nécessaire à mon humble avis de faire le plus possible
pour que l'on ne puisse plus voler les photos..
J'ai beaucoup de mes photos que GOOGLE m'a volé quand j'étais sur Panoramio..!
je les retrouve dans des sites de recherches..
un exemple.. **mes papillons**... si tu cherches un certain type de papillon
eh bien tu retrouves de mes photos car déjà je les reconnais mais en plus elles
sont toujours signées... par** ROL/Photo ou avant Roland**
mais cela ne se passe pratiquement plus.. je me suis séparé complètement de Google..
toutefois... les photos qui passent sur EXPLORER.. google les prends quand même..!
En tous les cas merci pour ton avertissement.. je serais encore plus prudent..
Bon W/end
* ઇઉ * club has replied to ROL/Photo club* ઇઉ * club has replied to RHHOn the subject in hand...what about non-comercial usages? I download lots of copyrighted stuff just to use as screensavers on my desktop or just to look at, for the sheer pleasure of it; and dozens of interesting texts for my research, not to mention snippets found on online papers and magazines.
Also, why pick on Yander alone? Google, Bing, Yahoo et al are as bad.
Closing the balancing act: the makers of the film Avatar lifted the plot straight from an Ursula K LeGuin novel (although they changed a few things to make the story more palatable to American audiences) and they didn't even give Ursula a credit, let alone a copyright fee.
You might have a valid point or two, but you're being too strict, rather selective and also a tad messianic in tone. There are far more important battles to fight in the world right now, wouldn't you say? :-)
RHH has replied to dolores666 club* ઇઉ * club has replied to dolores666 clubPictures, graphics and/or texts, etc., are always the property of the author, even if they don't bear a copyright notice. Use for private purposes is generally permitted. This means that if you use a work protected by copyright, for example, an image or text, as a screensaver, this is usually not legally attackable, but anything that goes beyond that. But you surely know all that yourself.
I've had corresponding experiences with Yandex, not with Google, Bing or Yahoo. It would be wrong for me to "judge" persons or institutions with whom I've had no comparable experience of my own - or to accept information from third parties without verification.
Sadly, when the creators of the film "Avatar" have really violated the copyrights of Ursula K LeGuin. Sadly, not only because they would give a very bad example.
I'm not the legislator, not even that of copyright laws or licensing regulations. My wording, however, generally follows the respective legal texts. Copyrights, like most other laws, aren't freely interpretable, and the Internet isn't a lawless space. If anyone doesn't like my respective wording, please complain to the authors of the legislative texts - or to oneself - in the event of a lack of self-regulation and discipline ( I think I'm dealing with grown-ups here and should, therefore, be allowed to express facts and truths unembellished - not softened up - as they are: Sometimes unpleasant).
Last but not least: Certainly there are bigger battles in the world, but if we don't start to change something in ourselves, it doesn't help us to want to improve the world. So, who wants or is allowed to decide if and which battle is more important when it comes to truth and justice? In the end, I'm not warning against the consequences of copyright infringements for my own sake, but have seized the opportunity that presented itself to me to raise awareness of the issue. We are here, after all, a photo community in which copyright infringements, including the violation of licensing regulations, aren't uncommon - unfortunately.
* ઇઉ * club has replied to RHH* ઇઉ * club has replied to RHH* ઇઉ * club has replied to RHHI sincerely regret that those who weren't responsible for this unavoidable measure were also affected, but it's the same as always in the so-called real world: We all have to suffer if one or the other people disregard rules of life, natural laws, or man-made laws.
This action has also not failed to leave its mark on me. I sincerely hope that those responsible for the future will change their minds and follow the rules with the necessary attention.
Thank you for your understanding and patience, Ron.
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Leo W clubIn my opinion, mostly thoughtless or unreflective usage habits and a lack of self-protection are the breeding ground for cybercrime of any kind.
As the "crown of creation or evolution", humans are extremely inventive when it comes to ruthlessly gaining personal advantages at the expense of others and/or creation in general. But this doesn't remain without effect, for due to natural principles any attack on life and limb - if it doesn't lead to death - ideally results in the mental and/or physical strengthening of the injured person, as most of us certainly know.
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Valeriane ♫ ♫ ♫¨* clubWishing you all the best and always good light.
Vous devriez traduire ceci en plusieurs langue
Comme on dit en Français à bon entendeur Salut
* ઇઉ * club has replied to ColRam club!!!! so belated in admiring your artistic, as usual , image but always and more than ever , if possible, delighted by your composition.
I must confess you that if I could , I were able to..I would guiltily copy but... Luckily for you?, for myself ? I know I wouldn't be ever able to do it :-)
Thanking you so artistic and thoughtful warning, I must say : either I don't think anybody would copy any of my photos, or I'm so lazy I wouldn't go searching to find it out.But this is only a matter of mine.
Obviously, on my own, It would never jump in my head to do something like that.
Only once it happened to me to catch and post a work of street artist in Padova and so rightly you warned me that I deleted it
SO: always thank you so much for your wonderful WORK!
Bea
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Beatrice Degan(MARS)However, I'd never have thought that even one of my pictures would be stolen and distributed without permission, and yet it happened, with almost all pictures from my gallery, although - God knows - there are much better pictures in this community. But what is it called? "Even the poor man still has something to rob him of." ;))
So, always thank you too for your amazing works!
Picture theft is a bottomless pit of problems... :(
One of the best solutions is probably doing what you do, that is to say posting "small" photographs... It's more difficult to exploit.
Have a lovely new week.
* ઇઉ * club has replied to Christiane ♥.•*¨`*•✿And yes, posting images in lower resolution and/or smaller size is one of the ways to protect yourself in the best possible way. But even that doesn't protect against people or institutions who want to get rich at the expense of others...
Thanks and have a lovely new week, too.
I wish you a nice weekend.
.......wünsche noch ein frohes Weihnachtsfest,ganz liebe Grüße Güni:))
* ઇઉ * club has replied to ©UdoSm clubWhether you could prevail in a lawsuit and sue Google or Otto Versand and others who infringe your rights to your images for damages is questionable given the statement in the last sentence of this paragraph.