Yves Published on January 27, 2008
by Yves

Yves's blog

Browse posts
I have new own music
Posted on February 26, 2008
13 comments (latest 10 months ago)
finally starting to move my pictures from flickr
Posted on February 4, 2008
3 comments (latest 21 months ago)
The popularity of the Canon 400D
10 comments (latest 21 months ago)
hard times
Posted on January 7, 2008
3 comments (latest 22 months ago)
My other account on ipernity (for portraits/shoots)
Posted on November 27, 2007
Internet Browser (for mac)
Posted on November 21, 2007
6 comments (latest 22 months ago)
Looking for new great jazz-records (what are your favorites? - have a look at mine)
Posted on August 10, 2007
21 comments (latest 20 months ago)
which music would you like to find here?
Posted on July 6, 2007
13 comments (latest 2 years ago)
How to make it easier dealing with the music here
Posted on July 5, 2007

More information

This post is public
All rights reserved
  1. Read 470 times

The popularity of the Canon 400D

Sunday January 27, 2008 at 02:02PM

It's funny, in the last months I almost didn't have a single week that I not found a photostream of guys showing off their new 400D. I just wonder, because most of these guys just get it as addition to their other DSLR(s), so no wonder, the quality of their images, bad or good, doesn't change at all. I guess it just must be cool to have one.

As for me, I wanted to have one as well for quite a while (just can't afford) and am still shooting on film - so for me it would change a lot as most of you can imagine (developing - money for the film and developing, you need to wait; scanning - time, between 2 and 3 hours for two films; etc.). I don't want to speak about the other advantages of especially a 400D for me now, slowly actually I start to wonder if in the end (when I finally can afford) I'm really gonna buy one... but as I just heard, there will be a new version, a 450D soon, so maybe the 400D might get cheaper... then of course I try to take that chance.....

10 Comments / add your comment?

MacKeypro says:
you won't be sorry if you get the 400D, i have one myself and i love it. i had a Nikon D70 before and i honestly was never satisfied with that one. besides you can't really go wrong with Canon :-)
Posted 22 months ago. ( permalink )
Yves replies:
Yeah, of course I won't be sorry... from all the things I heard and read and finally I'm also using a Canon SLR... :)
Posted 22 months ago. ( permalink )
L0zt S0uL says:
I *think* I read that they will keep the 400D in production, maybe as an even more entry level slr. I'm shooting a 20D right now, but beginning to browse for the next greatest and cheap body. Oddly enough, I'm also looking to purchase another film SLR, (currently have an EOS 650) - maybe an older T-90 that can use FD lenses, or maybe go for the gusto and pick up EOS 1N somewhere...

Have to admit though, I do not miss scanning film at all! But I do miss, at least a little bit, developing my own b/w, something about the suspense, and the craft involved is something digital cannot replace. Though, I won't be going 100% back to film anytime soon either, lol. Good luck in your quest and keep up the stunning work...
Posted 22 months ago. ( permalink )
Yves replies:
Yeah, I don't miss scanning at all neither... oh, still need to do it (except I pay a little more at the photo shop). =) And yes, I also never will stick to film 100%, but I still will keep it and play with some, if I gt the chance... Ah, and thanks for the kind wishes!!! :))
Posted 21 months ago. ( permalink )
Keisha Marshallpro says:
I heard that it is not actually what you use but how you use it...you can use old film cameras and still come out with some interesting creative work. Likewise you can use the most expensive camera and still not create as good work but it is all about the skills along with what you are trying to say in each creative piece. I myself have been trying to save up for a Nikon D80 ($1199). I have also been eyeballing these Canons: Canon EOS 40D ($1499) and Canos EOS 5D ($3299) in US dollars. Someone suggested to me that I buy a camera with DSLR capability. I have someone who I am acquainted with who shoots with a Nikon D200. I guess the Nikons and Canons are battling on their D's. ;) I still cannot decide what I am truly looking for, but the 5D looks serious from the Canon model. I need to do my research I suppose.
Posted 21 months ago. ( permalink )
Yves replies:
Yes, of course it's not only 'what' you use, but 'how' you use it, Keisha... as MacKey above mentioned, it's just also about some functions and stuff that make it easier to deal with them... And of course you can do great things, even with old film cameras, the film is of course an importrant factor too. As for DSLRs or SLRs in general I only can say that it also makes sense, if you really learn about what you can do with them and not only to have it as a kind of subject of prestige... as some just do it, buy a lot of great cameras and only do selfportraits with their various cameras in the pic to present them, hehe... =)
Posted 21 months ago. ( permalink )
M-Evolve says:
I use the Nikon D40x which is affordable, especially in a kit (one of the most popular kits includes the Nikkor f/3.5-5.6 18-55mm, which is a pretty versatile lens) and will deliver quality photos, on a par with the 400D, anytime.

The least positive aspects about the D40x are: 1. replacement batteries are twice as expensive as those for other Nikon bodies. 2. There is no compatible battery grip.

Owning more than one SLR when you're not a pro - especially models that are equivalent (in terms of quality and megapixellage) - is, if I may be so blunt, wasteful. Especially when any pro will tell you that it's not the camera, it's how you use it. A point & shoot may yield stunning results (the Canon point & shoots really deliver).

Some photographers go on their field shoots with a couple of cameras so they don't have to change lenses all the time. Lenses are the one investment that counts. Bodies become obsolete. Lenses actually gain value over time. I've noticed that the longer the focal distance, the more you will have to pay for a second-hand lens. Same with f stops: larger aperture = more expensive lens, first- or second-hand.

Nikon and Canon are the industry giants of the consumer/prosumer market and, short of Hasselblads or Mamiyas, you can't get any better.

I'd like to see those people who delight in "camera porn" buy a $25,000 Hasselblad just to show off...
Posted 21 months ago. ( permalink )
Yves replies:
Thanks a lot for your info!! :) Think I'm gonna stick to Canon though... my feeling tells me there are more advantages (price is for example an important factor for me and canon is for example compatible for sigma lenses..).

And yeah, guess you're very right that it makes not much sense to own more than one SLRs... unless the other one(s) have something to offer you can't find with a normal one, and what is hard to achieve through ps. And I think there's more than just hasselblad or so.....

Yeah, also guess it's more convinient to just have different cameras for different lenses... but it will take me some years to be able to have that... =)
Posted 21 months ago. ( permalink )
M-Evolve says:
Canon is a great brand and you couldn't go wrong. However, Sigma does make lenses for Nikons - that, or I have hallucinated my telephoto/macro lens....

But I would advise you to get Canon lenses whenever you can - I am not 100% happy with my Sigma, and I know of people who aren't, either.
Posted 21 months ago. ( permalink )
Yves replies:
=) Hmm, maybe you have hallucinated... :-P Hehe, no I just didn't know 'til now... but good to know.

Thanks also for the tip with the Sigma lenses... will keep it in mind.
Posted 21 months ago. ( permalink )

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...