wdj Published on December 25, 2008
by wdjpro

wdj's blog

Browse posts
What to Fight Over After Megapixels?
Posted on March 17, 2009
open raw
Posted on January 27, 2009
1 comment (latest 10 months ago)
Notes on composition and design (apres de Freeman), 2
Posted on December 28, 2008
Notes on composition and design (apres de Freeman), 1
Posted on December 27, 2008
2 comments (latest 11 months ago)
panasonic lumix FZ28 review
2 comments (latest 10 months ago)
Eyvind Earle (1916 – 2000)
Posted on October 18, 2008
film scanners for linux?
Posted on September 22, 2008
4 comments (latest 14 months ago)
Photography as a weapon
Posted on September 15, 2008
Vision and composition, 2
Posted on July 10, 2008
1 comment (latest 16 months ago)

More information

This post is public
Attribution + share Alike
  1. Read 286 times

panasonic lumix FZ28 review

Thursday December 25, 2008 at 01:36PM

I wanted to post this here since posting it at B+H Photo (a good online store for photo supplies) forces me to transfer all rights, which I didn't like. Unfortunately, I didn't discover that until I'd already written the review, so I'm posting here instead.


I'll probably use this camera from now on to replace the Nikon p5100 as my "carry around"
camera which I leave in my jacket pocket. I also own a Nikon D300, a few other cheaper compacts, and several film cameras.

The FZ28 was selected on the basis of it zoom capability and lots of research (basically reading lots of reviews by others, mostly at amazon.com and dpreview.com). I was frustrated with the P5100 on a few levels

(a) the noise in all but almost perfect shooting, which especially bad in low light settings,


(b) the lack of a significant zoom capability. (I was hoping that with the p5100 being 12M, I could simply crop but the noise was too bad usually to produce good photos.)

Regarding the FZ28, the main advantage is the zoom. It has a 10M sensor and 18x zoom (which I've read can be increased if you reduce the image size via the menu, but I haven't tried this).
The menu features are nice (a manual setting, for example), not significantly better than the Nikon p5100 IMHO. However, the zoom is great. the noise is not as bad as the p5100, and the lens
is very good.

Pros:

(a) Great zoom and good lens,
(b) Nice selection of menus options
(c) small enough to fit in a (large) jacket pocket.


Cons:
(a) It still has noise, just not as much as the p5100. (I base my comparisons with the Nikon D300, which is excellent, IMHO.)
(b) The autofocusing ability could be speedier.
(c) When shooting hand-held at full zoom, picures are often blurry due to slight hand-movement (this is not a defect in the camera, just a point that the buyer should be careful of).
(d) The raw format is so odd that very few software products can handle it, so either be prepared for changing your work-flow or simply ignoring it. (Why camera manufacturers can't decide on a common raw format is beyond me.)
(e) The lens caps makes "off the hip" shooting more awkward.

2 Comments / add your comment?

Rolandpro says:
Thanks for this distinct review!!
Posted 11 months ago. ( permalink )
Lison du Var ...... Moneypennypro says:
Thanks
I have just bought one ans it is my first bridge, so I have a lot to learn.
Posted 10 months ago. ( permalink )

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...