December 2008
  Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat  
    1 2 3 4 5 6  
  7 8 9 10 11 12 13  
  14 15 16 17 18 19 20  
  21 22 23 24 25 26 27  
  28 29 30 31        

Archives

October 2009 (1)
September 2009 (90)
August 2009 (105)
July 2009 (209)
June 2009 (203)
May 2009 (186)
April 2009 (141)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (29)
January 2009 (80)
December 2008 (64)
November 2008 (70)
October 2008 (110)
September 2008 (141)
August 2008 (94)
July 2008 (38)
June 2008 (7)
May 2008 (4)
April 2008 (1)
March 2008 (301)
February 2008 (157)
January 2008 (71)
December 2007 (112)
November 2007 (120)

December 2nd, 2008

Chances of a WMD Attack in a big city better than 50%??


Grabbed this on my iPhone just now and I have to admit that I don't trust this task force. These guys MUST be lying or hopelessly paranoid. There is no way you could say there's a better than 50/50 chance that a city will get hit by WMD.

Of course, bio or chem weapons I could see as being more likely, but still not a 50% chance, but nukes (which are what we all think of first when we hear the letters "WMD")?? No way, man, and reporting this story this way is nothing short of alarmist and fear mongering.

Reuters is really doing us a disservice by not making it immediately clear that nukes are much less likely than chem or bio. And even knowing that, when I saw that headline and read that first paragraph, I thought they meant their was a better than even chance that nukes would definitely hit a big city--then reality set in and I remembered how the odds of any random big city being hit are dramatically against.

Thanks, Reuters, for making us crap our pants...again!

Oh and newsflash: government task forces have been getting it wrong for the last 8 years--probably longer--all the press ever does is highlight the fear and bury the logic. Way to unquestioningly quote the party line and question little-to-nothing.

Posted by email from thepete's posterous


Published at 07:46 / 0 comments / 67 visits
This post is public

December 2nd, 2008

My Jailbroken iPhone 3G Starting Up with the 2.2 Update Onboard

Thanks to all the hackers out there who make this possible!! I am but a humble wannabe hax0r who wishes he had the dedication to hack on the same level as the guys at iphone-dev.org and everyone else who did work on the iPhone that I'm not even aware of.


Hacking goes to the very core of who I am as a person. I look at society and see a massively, uselessly complicated pile of rituals and traditions that have all been created by someone, sometimes for good reason, sometimes not. I see systems in place that exploit but reward, so they are tolerated. I see a country of people, in America, who allow so much to continue simply because they choose not to ask "why?" As humans, it's our job to ask "why?" of everything. There are always alternatives--sometimes they are better.


The iPhone is a perfect example of a system in place that shouldn't be there.

Hacking it via Jailbreaking re-exerts the rights we should all have over the things we willingly take into our lives.


It may seem a small victory over the lack of freedom that has crept into all of our lives, but it's a victory, at least. It also may seem odd to compare such grand ideals to something as geeky and seemingly inconsequential as a cell phone, but multiply all of these little compromises we make for society and you end up with a country of people who thinks a Cadillac is a sporty car and coal can be clean.


So, there you go--the iPhone is an awesome little powerhouse and now I have more power over it.




Posted by email from thepete's posterous


Published at 22:36 / 0 comments / 67 visits
This post is public

December 2nd, 2008

TO BE OR NOT TO BE (1942)


Click to buy!
Positive Experience/Entertaining? Without a doubt! This movie was a lot of fun and actually had a interesting dramatic edge that I wasn't expecting.


Technically any good? Once you accept that Jack Benny and the rest of the cast (including Robert Stack) are actually Polish and not Americans, the film is pretty damn near flawless. There were a couple of contrivances to keep the plot moving, but there are enough genuinely wonderful surprises to keep this movie in the "worth seeing" column for sure. Benny is actually quite good as an actor and not just a very funny man in his role as a "famous" Polish actor. The ending of this film falls a little flat, but for a film made sixty-six years ago, it's surprisingly solid and even resonant. The dialog is so insanely witty I was floored by some of it.


How did it leave me feeling? Mostly satisfied and the only reason I don't say "completely" satisfied is because the ending is a little shrug-worthy, but there are some amazingly tense moments in this "comedy" starring one of the biggest comedy greats of all time. See this movie.


Final Rating? GSN - Go See Now--or at least go rent it or Netflix it--or hell, buy it. It's definitely something you want to watch more than once.
Published at 23:59 / 0 comments / 49 visits
This post is public

December 3rd, 2008

Google Adsense (Doesn't) Fill Me With Confidence: 1 or 2 Rules to Flat a Stomach?

This is where automated ads really let us down. Which ad would you trust if you were staring at the two of these? How about and ad for Pepsi and Coke right next to each other? Sheesh. I'd trust neither.


So, Google Ads pays me next to nothing and after seeing ads like this, I don't wonder why--I mean, for crying out loud, I don't even blog about flat stomachs! Thanks for nothing, Google Adsense!




Posted by email from thepete's posterous


Published at 01:59 / 0 comments / 54 visits
This post is public

December 3rd, 2008

Posse Comitatus is Effectively Dead, Literal Death Coming Soon

Just a quick FYI on what Posse Comitatus is--it's an act that was passed into law back in 1878 and it keeps American military troops from enforcing the law. This law is a good thing because it stops the USA from being a military dictatorship. If the military enforces the law and not a civilian police force, that's exactly what you have. Sure, we may have elected Obama and our local officials, but the guy who decides to pull you over for a speeding violation might be holding an automatic rifle. You're going to do whatever that military person dictates.


All that said, let me direct you to a few headlines from ThePete.Com over the past month or two:







That first post was about how military troops would serve on active duty to support local authorities in times of disaster or a terrorist attack--but specifically, they are to be trained in dealing with "unruly or dangerous individuals and crowds." In other words, during times of emergency, they'll be doing things the police normally do.


The second post is about how the 3rd Infantry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team has begun active duty inside the US--this was back in early October, by the way.

The third post goes talks about Democracy Now holding a debate on the subject of Posse Comitatus and military troops on the streets of America. I added that mission creep might occur and these soldiers would go from playing police during an emergency, to playing police full-time after the disaster is done. Seems reasonable to assume mission creep is a possibility, since we went into Iraq for the WMDs and didn't leave when we found none.


Late last night, at 2:45am I saw a Reuters.com article and felt compelled to write a post with this title:

The Reuters article reported on the claims of a task force--they said that there's a better than 50/50 chance that a major city in the world will be hit by a WMD terrorist attack.


Then, yesterday, fellow Pete, Peter Santilli, of PeterSantilli.com, Twittered a link to a WashingtonPost.com article with the following headline:



Yep, apparently 20,000 more USGIs will be added to active duty on American soil by 2011. Here's a cutting from that WaPo article:


Before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, dedicating 20,000 troops to domestic response -- a nearly sevenfold increase in five years -- "would have been extraordinary to the point of unbelievable," Paul McHale, assistant defense secretary for homeland defense, said in remarks last month at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. But the realization that civilian authorities may be overwhelmed in a catastrophe prompted "a fundamental change in military culture," he said.


So, what changed here with the non-military culture (us)? Was there really less hatred for America before 911? That would strike me as impossible since, if people didn't hate America before September 2001, 911 would never have happened, right? So, why are our values suddenly different? Why are we suddenly OK with troops serving inside America's borders?


3000 people died on 911. That's less than the number of American soldiers who died in Iraq. It's nothing compared to the number of Iraqis died in our invasion of their country--yet, here we are accepting a virtual military dictatorship, but only in the case of a "nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe," say Pentagon officials.


And what an amazing coincidence that a task force announces that they feel some major city in the world has a better than 50 percent chance of being hit by WMD when they did? Isn't this just perfect timing for the military, the politicians and the military industrial complex?


Lots of money to be made in the fear industrial complex!

Now, I don't think 911 was an inside job, but I do think it was a virtual inside job--that is to say that I think 911 was allowed to happen. What kind of leaders ignore the obvious signs that something like this could happen? We don't need a police state to be able to scramble fighter jets that can intercept hijacked aircraft. We don't need the Patriot Act to stop known terrorists from entering the country and taking pilot lessons. We just need our leaders to do their jobs.


That's what upsets me the most in all of this--the Home Minister of Mumbai resigned after his mishandling of the Mumbai Attacks last week. Have we had one person resign in shame because of 911? And now we're supposed to assume that the same people who let 911 happen are going to not screw this up, too?


And what about Obama's supposed "change we need"? Well, his cabinet is made up almost entirely of Clintonites and you may recall that they were in charge of America until just eight months before 911 happened. So, it's a cross-partisan breakdown of leadership.


What can we do?

Beats me, man. I'm just a blogger.




Posted by email from thepete's posterous


Published at 02:53 / 0 comments / 58 visits
This post is public

December 3rd, 2008

GREAT DICTATOR (1940)


Click to buy the 2-disk set!
Positive Experience/Entertaining? This is a truly impressive film. I had always heard good things about this movie, but the film largely does live up to the hype.


Technically any good? While I've never been a fan of comedians speaking gibberish in a way that it both sounds fun and sounds like another language, the film makes up for this in spades. To be honest, I did find myself laughing at the gibber-speak, but still felt like it wouldn't be done in a comedy, today.

The acting was a solid as you'd expect--that is to say, not great, but perfectly reasonable, for sure. The story is very solid, following a sort of "prince and pauper" vibe as silent movie comic actor/director/auteur Charlie Chaplin plays both the prince (a very Hitler-esque dictator) and the pauper (a Jewish barber). The setup is clearly absurd, but entirely brilliant. This is seriously amazing film making.


How did it leave me feeling? Seriously moved--there's a wonderful speech at the end that nearly brought tears to my eyes--it was disturbingly resonant in today's war-filled culture. I could not believe that something from sixty-eight years ago could still be true--and since it's about war and profit, how depressing is that? VERY.

Good on you, Mr. Chaplin! It's a shame you're dead. You'd be wishing you were, anyway. :(


Final Rating? GSN - Go See Now--this is a cinema classic for a reason. It's also a perfect double feature with To Be Or Not To Be. TheWife and I both agreed that George W. Bush should be forced to listen to Chaplin's big speech every morning before breakfast.
Published at 17:01 / 0 comments / 48 visits
This post is public

December 4, 2008

KING CORN (2007)


Click to buy!
Positive Experience/Entertaining? Definitely, but depressing, too. I knew that corn is a bit of a SNAFU industry in this country, but it's much worse than I thought.


Technically any good? Without coming out too much on the anti-corn side of things, this docu does a pretty good job of explaining the situation we're in with corn and it's not good. Farmers are apparently paid to not make a profit and there's too much corn being made every year and not all of it is even edible. Don't worry, there are a lot of other things inedible corn can be used for like something good like fuel or something horrible like HFCS. This movie is unbelievable, but unless they lied, so is the situation we Americans are in with corn. This movie breaks a lot of it down and even shows you that you can make high fructose corn syrup in your kitchen (it's apparently pretty dangerous).


How did it leave me feeling? Disturbed but unshocked. I am rarely surprised by the depths of absurdity our culture goes to in order to make capitalism work. I'm no commie, but this film illustrates the problem nonsensical capitalism brings to our lives. Check it out, you won't be sorry.


Final Rating? GSN - Go See Now--seriously--if more people knew how corn worked in this society, there would be change. (Well, I hope there would be change, anyway...)
Published at 17:02 / 0 comments / 34 visits
This post is public

December 5, 2008

SOUTHERN CROSS (1984)

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Definitely, though as with a lot of older anime, the cultures do clash a bit with American sensibilities. Still, the series is generally enjoyable if you can get past the truly crappy prog-rock rip-off music on the soundtrack. :(


Technically any good? This series is a sort of sequel to the original Macross series. However, there are no characters that cross over and there's really no reference to Macross at all. The only connection is the inclusion of two words in the full title of the series "Super Dimensional Cavalry Southern Cross." Those first two words are the same "SD" in the "SDF" of Macross. The only other similarity beyond those two words is the production company that made it--as a result, the animation is about as bad as it was for Macross so don't expect anything too amazing. The acting is just fine, as it often is in anime. The story, while it does feel a bit laborious at times, is generally pretty solid and enjoyable. It's got a great message at the end that I'm starting to recognize in other Macross-related anime.

Sadly, the music leaves a lot to be desired, but I think it's worth sticking with it anyway. There's also a bit of unnecessary nudity, but it's not too gratuitous. The mecha designs are probably the worst I've seen, but the characters are fairly well developed, so if you're like me, with story trumping all else, it's still watchable. The ending feels a little rushed, but that makes sense given the series was canceled early. Still, it manages to eek out a much more coherent, poignant and even resonant ending than a lot of better known anime. The ending also suggests a more than passing comparison to the Israel/Palestine conflict. (The premise of the series surrounds a group of humans that have colonized a planet formerly inhabited by aliens who left it behind--now they want it back and these humans are in their way.)


How did it leave me feeling? Pretty satisfied. It's not the greatest anime in the world, but it's definitely fun. If you're on a quest to watch EVERYTHING even vaguely connected to the original Macross this is not punishment the way Macross Plus is.


Final Rating? NFI - NetFlix It--if you can. Not sure how available this series is on DVD anymore. I managed to find a copy, but I got lucky, I think.

NOTE TO ROBOTECH FANS: There's a reason you probably think the Southern Cross portion of the Robotech saga is the worst of the three story lines--it's because the original story was very edited to explain how "Dana Sterling" could be Max and Myria's daughter, blah-blah-blah. In the original un-Robotech-ized version the series makes much more sense. Lt. Jeanne is a brash, young flygirl (like flyboy) who runs her group of soldiers by the seat of her pants.
Published at 17:01 / 0 comments / 51 visits
This post is public

December 6, 2008

Chicago Factory Worker Occupation Shows What Happens When the System Fails (We All Fail)

OK, so here's how I was told it was supposed to all work growing up:

1) You go to college
2) You get a good job (because you went to college)
3) Your boss pays you because he makes money in the business you both work at.

The reality in 2008:

1) college is becoming much too expensive for the majority of Americans to afford
2) no one is hiring because no one is making any money because no one is buying because no one is making any money etc, etc...
3) Your boss lays you off because most of point 2 applies to him AND in the case of one Chicago factory , he doesn't even pay you

See, here's what's going on right now in a factory in Chicago according to an article at ChicagoTribune.com:

Workers laid off from their jobs at a factory have occupied the building and are demanding assurances they'll get severance and vacation pay that they say they are owed.

About 200 employees of Republic Windows and Doors began their sit-in Friday, the last scheduled day of the plant's operation. On Saturday, about 50 workers could be seen through a window sitting on chairs and pallets on the factory floor. Reporters were asked to stay out of the plant's work area.

If you have a Digg.com account, please Digg this important labor rights story .

See, the company that owns the factory isn't making much money these days thanks to no one spending any money thanks to them not making any money these days. Sorry, you know this bit.

But remember a few months back when King George talked about our entire economy being in danger? He also made the point in that speech that "every day lending" had to continue. This suggests that loans are something businesses take out all the time just to keep the gears of capitalism lubricated.

This suggests that without said loans, most businesses would fall apart.

Whose idea was a system that had to perform like a shark? If it stops moving, it dies.

The problem is, that because we're all relying on this system, we all suffer.

So, banks fail, and can't give every day loans to businesses that rely on those loans to pay employees. Employees then can't eat or pay their bills or their mortgages and so they go hungry and homeless. Then, the banks don't get paid back and they can't give loans and they can't loan to businesses and--sorry, again, you know this bit...

Yeah, good plan, assholes. Does anyone else see the circle-jerk-cum-downward-spiral there?

And just why should businesses need every day loans to pay their employees? Shouldn't their employee's pay come from what the company makes? And if they can't make money why are banks giving loans to them?

This whole system sounds completely screwed up and I've lost even more faith in American political, business and financial leaders for supporting this thing. As a fiction writer I couldn't get away with a premise like this one.

You know the old saying that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link? What happens when all the links are weak? The chain morphs into another cliched metaphor--the house of cards. This was just a matter of time, folks. The signs of our failing economy were all around us, too. I've been blogging for years about various canaries in the mineshaft. I wrote a post a year-and-a-half ago about how Tower Records closing down was a sure sign our economy was in decline, like it or not.

As a former fanboy I watched my most prized scifi toys sell for a fraction of what they should have gone for. As an inhabitant of a major American city, I saw a number of local businesses close and get replaced by chains like Starbucks or Blockbuster (even if they weren't coffee shops or video stores in the first place). Another canary is that our currency isn't based on any thing real--no gold standard, no silver standard, just the credit of Americans as being able to produce goods and services.

Of course, America just lost over a half-million jobs last month , so you can imagine how much that hurts the value of our dollar. Less jobs means less ability for the American people to produce goods and services which means less value for our dollar. That, in turn, weakens our economy even more.

You know what this all is? It's a series of dominoes falling in very slow motion.

These dominoes are still falling. Can the Obama administration stop them?


Posted via email from thepete's posterous


Published at 22:01 / 0 comments / 51 visits
This post is public

December 7, 2008

Our First Snow in NYC





Our 1st Snow in NYC, originally uploaded by thepetecom.


Yay! This is video of our first snow as New York residents! ENJOY! :)



And NO, it's not just flurries since it did stick to the roofs of cars. :P


Published at 03:28 / 0 comments / 62 visits
This post is public

December 8, 2008

You Must Watch "CHUCK" Tonight! My Buddy Alexander Fazel is In It!!

My very good friend Alexander Fazel is an actor out there in Los
Angeles and he manage to get himself a gig on the NBC show
CHUCK. His episode, entitled "Chuck Vs. The
DeLorean
" apparently airs TONIGHT at 8pm on NBC and will also be
available tomorrow on iTunes for just $1.99!! So, TUNE IN, PLEASE!
(Or iTune in, I suppose!) Watch for the Arab billionaire's sidekick,
that's my buddy, Alexander :) To help you spot him in the show, check
out an episode of The 5 Minute Show that I shot with him back
in June of 2006:



As you can see, he's pretty funny, a handsome dude and damn talented.
So, be sure to watch Chuck, tonight!

I will thank you and so will Alexander!!

Check out more episodes of my webcast The 5 Minute Show here:
http://tv.thepete.com/tag/the-5-Minute-Show/

Posted via email from thepete's posterous


Published at 19:32 / 0 comments / 54 visits
This post is public

December 8, 2008

Dane Cook Ringtones: the Real Reason I Hacked my iPhone!

And here I thought video messaging would come *before* the Dane Cook ringtones. Well, it seems like some hackers really have their priorities straight!

I kid the hackers, but I love 'em!

Posted via email from thepete's posterous


Published at 22:44 / 0 comments / 41 visits
This post is public

December 8, 2008

Dane Cook Ringtones: the Real Reason I Hacked my iPhone!

And here I thought video messaging would come *before* the Dane Cook ringtones. Well, it seems like some hackers really have their priorities straight!

I kid the hackers, but I love 'em!

Posted via email from thepete's posterous


Published at 22:46 / 0 comments / 43 visits
This post is public

Published at 01:30 / 0 comments / 58 visits
This post is public

December 9, 2008

HELLBOY 2 (2008)


Buy the 3-disc DVD set!
Positive Experience/Entertaining? It was definitely fun, but the bar was set just a bit too high with the first Hellboy movie, sadly, so I found this one to be disappointing.


Technically any good? FX and designs were AMAZING. Visually, this film was STUNNING. Unfortunately, the visuals and FX are the only reasons to see the film beyond some solid acting by the leads. Sadly, the script is cliche, contrived and annoying. There were just too many "that was supposed to be funny?" moments in it. The first Hellboy seemed confident in itself as being a good movie, where this one felt like it was trying hard to prove itself. I should also point out that Selma Blair always falls a little flat for me, but I feel like she just needs a good shove and she'll be amazing.


How did it leave me feeling? Vaguely entertained, but disappointed. It's always hard to follow up a good movie with an as-good sequel, but I felt like this script fell into some obvious traps and came off much more cliched than it should have.


Final Rating? NFI - NetFlix It. Don't spend any money on this one unless it's your monthly Netflix subscription. :) Though, if you disagree and plan on buying the DVD, please buy Hellboy 2 from my Amazon store so I can get a cut. Thanks! ^_^
Published at 17:01 / 0 comments / 50 visits
This post is public

December 9, 2008

President-Elect Barack Hussein Obama's Cabinet So Far

Wow, well, it's looking good for the forces of evil, or at least, the forces of lameness. I guess we indy-types shouldn't be too surprised that Obama can't deliver the "change" promise he ran on. He may still be promising new ideas, but let's look at some of the old people Obama's appointed to his cabinet so far:

Treasury Secretary: Timothy Geithner, president of Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
ThePete Says: Wow, one of the handful of people that controls America's money supply as TreasSec? Meh, I'd rather get some generally independent economist from outside the system that is currently crumbling under its own weight. Also, he was TreasSec under Clinton, so you might suggest that Geithner had something to do with setting the dinner table we're all financially going hungry at right now.

I remember reading something about how Geithner was supposed to be corporate-experience-free--but guess what? Running a FedRes bank is, for all intents and purposes, the same thing as running a corporation. Apparently, Geithner was also instrumental in orchestrating the bailout of Bear Sterns. He also worked for Kissinger Associates--as in Henry Kissinger (many look at this man as a war criminal).

Secretary of State: Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.
ThePete Says: Giving her "lost to Obama" status, this seems like a fair appointment (though I'd still prefer her as VP). However, it doesn't get much more Clintony than an actual Clinton. I know most of Americans are used to blaming Bush for all of our troubles, but remember, these economic problems are actually more complicated and older than the media is explaining right now. As I mentioned above, the table we're all starving at right now was set by the Clinton Administration.

That said, I actually believe Hillary will make an OK SoS. (!) Of course, that's in comparison to previous ones, which isn't setting the bar too high, I think.

Attorney General: Eric Holder, former deputy attorney general.
ThePete Says: Yikes, this is the dude who defended Chiquita Banana against lawsuits accusing the fruit company of supporting terrorism (which they did, in order to keep farming bananas in Columbia). He was also Deputy AG under Bill Clinton and feels drug penalties should be more harsh.

Defense Secretary: Robert Gates, a holdover from Bush administration.
ThePete Says: I love how the AP calls Gates a "holdover" from the Bush Admin. They're almost all holdovers from previous administrations. Yet the AP seems to think this is not significant. What's even funnier is that Gates is not only a holdover from George W.'s admin, but he was also the head of the CIA under George H.W. Bush. That makes him pretty much entrenched in evil. ;)

To be more specific, the Wikipedia page for Robert Gates reminds us of his role in the the Iran-Contra Affair. Remember that old chestnut?

Homeland Security Secretary: Gov. Janet Napolitano, D-Ariz.
ThePete Says: Don't think that just because she's a Democrat she's not a racist xenophobe like most southern-border-based Republicans. Seems Napolitano is quite the hawk when it comes to cracking down on illegal immigration having called for not only National Guard support along the border but also asking for more ICE resources to be sent to Arizona, as well. She was also a US state attorney under Bill Clinton--yep, she's another Clintonite.

National Security Adviser: Retired Marine Gen. James Jones.
ThePete Says: I don't know much about this guy. Turns out he's a former NATO commander and also served on the boards of Chevron and Boeing. Yeah, two big-ass companies, one oil and the other military/industrial (you know, like the complex). According to James L. Jones' Wikipedia page, he:

....became president of the Institute for 21st Century Energy, an affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and chair of the board of directors of the Atlantic Council of the United States. He also served as chairman of the Independent Commission on Security Forces of Iraq.


Hmmm, seems like that energy institute thing hasn't worked out so well and that whole thing where he was to, according to that same Wikipedia page:

...investigate for 120 days the capabilities of the Iraq armed forces and police.


That hasn't worked out either. Granted, he did find "serious deficiencies in the Iraq Interior Ministry and in the Iraq National Police" but his alleged strong negotiating skills didn't exactly get his findings accepted as fact. Of course, the Bush Administration isn't known for their acceptance of facts, are they?

Commerce Secretary: Gov. Bill Richardson, D-N.M.
ThePete Says: Meh, yet another Clintonite. Richardson was Energy Secretary under the Billster. He is also the object of scorn for some Chinese Americans who felt that he was unusually racisty during the Wen Ho Lee mess. Lee was the fellow who was wrongly accused by the Clinton admin for spying for the Chinese. Apparently, Richardson tried to encourage the idea that any Chinese people in the US could be spies.

Here's a big however--I do like Richardson. I've seen him in a bunch of interviews and he seems like a fairly reasonable guy. Another however is that just because he's reasonable doesn't mean he's a good leader.

National Economic Council Director: Lawrence Summers, former treasury secretary.
ThePete Says: Haha, another Clintonite and another guy who's partially responsible for our current money mess. Back in 1991 Summers was chief economist for the World Bank and wrote a memo suggesting that pollution from first world countries could be exported to third world countries which he consider to be "underpolluted".

You may also remember Summers as the dude who had to resign as president of Harvard University after he said publicly that women had less innate scientific ability than men.

Office of Management and Budget Director: Peter Orszag, director of Congressional Budget Office.
ThePete Says: I hardly know anything about this guy, either. But if he's in charge of money now, that worries me. However, Democracy Now reported that Orszag felt the bank bailout would make things worse, not better and testified to that. So, he gets points from me on that.

Veterans Affairs Secretary: Retired Gen. Eric K. Shinseki
ThePete Says: Ahhh, OK, cool--this dude is OK, as far as military-types go. He was the guy who was ignored by the Bush Administration when he told them the Iraq Attack would require waaaay more troops that the Bushites wanted to send in. Turns out Shinseki was right (as you may have noticed).

TheCONCLUSION: I don't see a lot of change with this cabinet, so far. Sure, it's tentative and the names could change as they are rejected by vetting or by Congress. Still, there have to be perfectly competent people out there who have not held positions in the Clinton Admin or in the financial or corporate worlds who can be appointed. I'm sick of all of these damned insiders. Nothing is ever going to change if the same people keep getting cycled through Washington.

Am I being a bit harsh? Maybe, but it's the media's job to play devil's advocate for everything the government does. Figure, the government puts forth the "pro" argument for everything they do. Who will represent the "con" argument? Some lame Republican think-tanks? That's just letting the system criticize itself--the press needs to represent the non-government opinion and be critical of all. That's how they've let us down and that's why I cite only the negative aspects of Obama's appointees. I figure, if you want to read how good these people are, go to Obama's blog, Change.gov. Come to me for some contrarian stuff :)
Published at 20:02 / 0 comments / 66 visits
This post is public

December 10, 2008

One Day for Human Rights

I'll be blogging more about human rights today, inline with the website OneDayForHumanRights.com

In the meantime, head over there and see what's up.
Published at 07:00 / 0 comments / 47 visits
This post is public

December 10, 2008

Human Rights and the Promises of Our Leaders

Human Rights are something that, here in America, aren't really thought about until someone we know or care about becomes a victim to them. In some areas in the world everyone knows someone who has had their rights abridged or outright squashed. We've all heard of those places, so I won't go into them here. Just know that for all of our own advancements here in America, the vast majority of humanity has been left behind. Most of Earth's citizens are still waiting to see a world that protects the rights of all humans.

In this sense, our leaders have universally let us down. The role of governments (and the leaders who run them) is supposed to be to protect the rights of their citizens. The thing is, we have trouble making sure that happens here in the US. There are still too many people who are silenced or worse. Sure, it's easy to point to things that have happened under the Bush Administration, but the reality is no US administration has put human rights front and center. In fact, in previous decades and even centuries, the USG has sponsored military actions, coups and even full-blown wars solely in the interest of securing capitalism as the dominant economic system in other countries.

So, when someone talks to you about human rights and how they should be supported, don't think that just because you live in the US or another western country you don't need to worry about them. Here in the US we still have a long way to go. In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, written sixty years ago, there is a passage about marriage:
Article 16

1. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
2. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
3. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.


Guess what Prop 8 over in California is about. Yep. Gay marriage. Stopping gays from getting marriage is a violation of the UDHR. Our leaders shouldn't even allow something like Prop 8 to get put up to a vote since it violates basic human rights. Yet, there it is.

Human rights activist Jack Healy posted about the UDHR's birthday a couple days ago on HuffPo and in that post he said, in part, this in reference to the UDHR:

By the year 2010, 42% of the world will be under the age of 21. As was seen in the recent American election, there is a clamoring for change amongst this demographic. This exists not only for young people at home, but all over the world. When injustice occurs in far corners of the globe, this document empowers the innocent against the oppressor. Just as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. pointed to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as an example of justice and equality, so to will this new generation need a rulebook to combat oppression.

Such a rulebook already exists in this Declaration. For 60 years, governments have let this document gather dust in a closet.


...and our governments, across the planet, have let us down.

I'm not an anarchist, but ya know, now that I think about it...

Read the Universal Declaration of Human Rights over at OneDayForHumanRights.com

Hell, I think there should be a 365daysAYearForHumanRights.com!
Published at 22:25 / 0 comments / 52 visits
This post is public

December 11, 2008

CABINET OF DR. CALIGARI (1920)


Buy it on DVD!
Positive Experience/Entertaining? HELL yeah. This is my all time favorite silent movie (though Metropolis is a very close second favorite).


Technically any good? The story follows the events in a small European village after Dr. Caligari and his cabinet arrives. He charges people to see "Cesare the Somnambulist" who spends his entire life sleeping in Caligari's cabinet to be woken only by the doctor, himself. But when people in the village start dying, who is to blame?

One of the most characteristic things about this movie is how they didn't try to do anything with lighting--instead, they literally paint the shadows onto the sets. The effect is that the actors literally pop off the screen and the sets look creepy and surreal.

The acting in this 1920 silent film is perfectly reasonable for the time period, though if you've never seen a silent before you may have trouble accepting their behavior. The story is wonderful and invented a premise that would be used often in the scifi and horror genres over the following century. So far, I'm not sick of the premise yet.


How did it leave me feeling? Creeped-out, as always. I've seen this movie a bunch of times (most recently projected with live music and SFX--the best way to see it!) and it never fails to entertain me. I also see new things I've missed before with each viewing.


Final Rating? GSN - Go See Now - if you can find it on the big screen, that's the best way to really appreciate it, but really it's good on small screens, too.
Published at 17:02 / 0 comments / 41 visits
This post is public

December 11, 2008

I Blog About Human Rights and Google Adsense Gives Me an Arabic Ad

Yesterday I blogged about human rights and look at that Google Ad on
the left there. I didn't know I had very many Arabic readers (or
any). Thanks for nothing Google!

Posted via email from thepete's posterous


Published at 20:09 / 0 comments / 47 visits
This post is public

← previous 1 2 3 4 next →

( 64 posts )

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...