Scoo Published on February 7, 2009
by Scoopro

Scoo's blog

Browse posts
Out with the old, in with the new
Posted on July 20, 2009
3 comments (latest 4 months ago)
The art of colour separations
5 comments (latest 9 months ago)
Street action times two
Posted on August 15, 2008
1 comment (latest 11 months ago)
On vacation..
Posted on July 10, 2008
2 comments (latest 15 months ago)
First self-developed B&W roll
Posted on May 15, 2008
4 comments (latest 18 months ago)
Chapter Two - the nickname
Posted on May 5, 2008
2 comments (latest 18 months ago)
Chapter one, why I do it.
Posted on April 20, 2008

More information

This post is public
All rights reserved
  1. Read 248 times

The art of colour separations

Saturday February 7, 2009 at 04:32PM

How to combine several black and white images in order to get one in colour.



A couple of years ago I browsed the stream of a fellow at flickr and saw his experiments into colour separations. I didn't think more of it until I browsed the online exhibition of Sergei Prokudin-Gorskij (1863-1944) at the U.S. Library of Congress called The Empire that was Russia. To make a long story short, Prokudin-Gorskij took three exposures of a scene through a red, a green and a blue filter. When these were projected afterwards it was possible to view a colour image. Nowadays (with digital image processing etc.) it's quite easy compared with then to scan each individual frame and then put together a composite image ('making of' section at LoC).

Generally I've seen very little of this on the net, at photo.net there was a post about a chap who lit a stilleben through RGB-coloured stage lights in order to get a similar result.



This I've attempted a couple times before with varying success. Here's my procedure:

Colour separation procedure
Colour separation procedure

1.Take three exposures through a red, a green and a finally a green filter (in my case a 25A, X1 and a 80B as these are the filters I have [the letter and number combinations are the technical designations of the filters].l).

2. Scan them (to save time scan them in 8 bits/pixel) and set the image mode to RGB (if you scanned them in grayscale). Then tint them (in my case via photoshop's channel mixer, any equivalent would do) in red, green and blue (images #1, #2 and #3). For example, for the red image, using the channel mixer I left the red channel at 100% and set the green and blue channel at 0%.

3. Decide upon one image to use as the bottom one (or anchor) in order to line up the sequence of images (I've done as the LoC and chosen the red one). Then copy the green and blue image onto the red one. Set the opacity to 33% for the layer containg the green info and the same for the blue layer. Align both layers using the red one as a reference. Usually moving items (clouds, tree branches, waves etc. will stand out in either colour [RGB]).

4. When the images have been aligned, flatten the image. Usually one should see the embryo of the resulting image at this stage (in my case, red is a bit too dominant as evident by image no. #4). Then, using the levels or curves command or whatnot, set the correct colour balance, brightness & contrast. This is the tricky part. Of the images I've taken using this method only one has been somewhat suffessfull/accurate (see links below). As #5 and #6 show, one can muck about as much as one like to trying to get a pleasing result. Factors that influence the result is the spectral sensitivity of the film used, strength of the colour filters, the subjective treatment of the source files when scanning etc etc.

First attempt (red-green)

First RGB attempt (red-green-blue)

First successful RGB

A so-so sucessful sunset



More to come at a later date...

5 Comments / add your comment?

Siegfried Vogel says:
This is interesting in its historical context.
In Photoshop, in theory you should be able to generate a color picture of 24 bit (3+8) bit depth, which would be very detailled in its tones.
Posted 9 months ago. ( permalink )
Scoopro replies:
Yes, this is a bit like technicolor (though additive as opposed to technicolors subtractive method). These shots I've displayed on the web are 24 bit RGB ones (8 bits per channel). So far I've only managed to get images that look like poor 256-colour GIF ones...
Posted 9 months ago. ( permalink )
_dix_ says:
This is so interesting... Photoshop does, as usual, offer lots of different ways to reach the same destination.

Today I experimented with a few digital shots taken through red, green and blue filters which I destaturated in the RAW converter first (aligning white balance and exposure comp along the way).

Then I copied the resulting gray images into three different new full colour channels of an empty RGB file (shot from red filter to new red channel etc.), then got rid of the original channels #1, 2 and 3 (RGB).

I then divided the remaining channels and immediately put them together again, using RGB as colour mode.

The result, as I didn't care for composition at that moment, is utterly boring, but at least I do know now that this does work.

Thanks for the inspiration!
Posted 9 months ago. ( permalink )
Scoopro replies:
That sounds really great! Shooting digitally with this technique could be quite interesting (say for a busy marketplace or pedestrian street or such, where one would have ghostly figures in each colour if they moved about when shooting the sequence).

Go ahead and tell others and good luck!
Posted 9 months ago. ( permalink )
_dix_ replies:
I like this ghost figure idea... could give a really nice series. Need to get a filter revolver like in stage lighting though, for quick operation :-)
Posted 9 months ago. ( permalink )

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...