◄DRB► Published on March 19, 2008
by ◄DRB►

◄DRB►'s blog

Browse posts
I'm just about finished with Ipernity!
Posted on June 7, 2008
27 comments (latest 4 weeks ago)
Dead in the Water!
Posted on May 21, 2008
8 comments (latest 4 months ago)
Please Comment?
Posted on April 24, 2008
17 comments (latest 5 months ago)
The Ten Legal Commandments of Photography
5 comments (latest 6 months ago)
Reposting Stuff!!
Posted on March 11, 2008
4 comments (latest 7 months ago)
How to deal with Jackasses
Posted on March 11, 2008
1 comment (latest 7 months ago)
Ipernity Greasemonky Import Scripts
Posted on March 4, 2008
2 comments (latest 7 months ago)
An ipernity minus
Posted on February 29, 2008
4 comments (latest 7 months ago)
I've Had Enough...
Posted on February 23, 2008
10 comments (latest 7 months ago)

More information

This post is public
© All rights reserved
  1. 292 visits

The Ten Legal Commandments of Photography

Wednesday March 19, 2008 at 02:34AM

Your Thoughts?

 

Be sure and click on the link to read the complete editorial!!

 

 

The Ten Legal Commandments of Photography

 

 

I. Anyone in a public place can take pictures of anything they want. Public places include parks, sidewalks, malls, etc. Malls? Yeah. Even though it’s technically private property, being open to the public makes it public space.

II. If you are on public property, you can take pictures of private property. If a building, for example, is visible from the sidewalk, it’s fair game.

III. If you are on private property and are asked not to take pictures, you are obligated to honor that request. This includes posted signs.

IV. Sensitive government buildings (military bases, nuclear facilities) can prohibit photography if it is deemed a threat to national security.

V. People can be photographed if they are in public (without their consent) unless they have secluded themselves and can expect a reasonable degree of privacy. Kids swimming in a fountain? Okay. Somebody entering their PIN at the ATM? Not okay.

VI. The following can almost always be photographed from public places, despite popular opinion:

  • accident & fire scenes, criminal activities
  • bridges & other infrastructure, transportation facilities (i.e. airports)
  • industrial facilities, Superfund sites
  • public utilities, residential & commercial buildings
  • children, celebrities, law enforcement officers
  • UFOs, the Loch Ness Monster, Chuck Norris

VII. Although “security” is often given as the reason somebody doesn’t want you to take photos, it’s rarely valid. Taking a photo of a publicly visible subject does not constitute terrorism, nor does it infringe on a company’s trade secrets.

VIII. If you are challenged, you do not have to explain why you are taking pictures, nor to you have to disclose your identity (except in some cases when questioned by a law enforcement officer.)

IX. Private parties have very limited rights to detain you against your will, and can be subject to legal action if they harass you.

X. If someone tries to confiscate your camera and/or film, you don’t have to give it to them. If they take it by force or threaten you, they can be liable for things like theft and coercion. Even law enforcement officers need a court order.

5 Comments / add your comment?

jolo (sophie.paris) says:
in france of course we have privacy laws and you may face a civil action if you publish a photograph of someone without permission. Under France's privacy laws, photographers are expected to obtain written permission before the publication of any image of a person, including someone in a crowd. This is generally ignored, for practical reasons, with picture editors preferring to blank out faces or car registration plates.

Injunctions are often filed against magazines in France before publication, forcing them to publish blank pages featuring a legal text instead of the contentious photograph. Liability is generally seen as being with the publication, not the photographer.
Posted 6 months ago. ( permalink )
Trova says:
That's my understanding as well from what I've read. Well said!
Posted 6 months ago. ( permalink )
☠ Covert Camera ☠ pro says:
Worth noting that the use of a photograph of a person for commercial purposes is against the law without consent, but *taking* the photograph is perfectly legal, provided there is no "reasonable expectation of privacy".

Nice post, and thanks!
smile

--
Seen in dread_pirate_roberts home page (?)
Posted 6 months ago. ( permalink )
Ger & Mat says:
Laws are different in different countries - trying to obey the laws in europe is a nightmare - 26 countries and 26 different laws for the same thing...

Re photography:
My feeling would be that anything (objects of any sort) that is in the public domain (inclusive of museum, state galleries, palaces etc) are fair game! Though that is not the law...

I feel that the 'oops' photos of innocent people in a public space have to be private!
..... Thinking purely about the unfortunate person 'oops' happened to it seems reasonable to expect that privacy due to the fact that 'oops person' had no intention to have 'oops' happen to him/her (mostly her). Otherwise 'oops person' would have left the blouse at home. We don't know what state of mind 'oops person' is in when 'oops' happens and 'oops person' may have whatever complex issue regarding his/her (mostly her) body.
For that reason I dont like paparazi hunting down anyone for the shot of the day for next days newspaper or blog.
Ger
Posted 6 months ago. ( permalink )
CAS says:
Thanks for the INFO.
I think I will now go and harass that annoying guard.
Posted 6 months ago. ( permalink )

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of this post comments.