| April 2008 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | ||
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | ||
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||||
There are two paintings in a gallery of Art, both for sale and for exhibition.
There is one painter that never sells anything, but people goes, seats in front of his painting for hours. However, his painting is always there, on the wall, being watched.
There is one painter that never attracts this sort of attention. Nobody goes to seat in front of his painting. However, every time the gallery shows a new piece, somebody buys the piece.
None of these artists are known or have any fame, they are just anonymous artists.Both paintings are well painted, with similar styles and subject, similar formats and techniques.
MY QUESTION: Which painting DO YOU BELIEVE has more value from the point of view of Art and WHY?
This is not a contest, is a way of thinking together. I have my opinion of course, but not everybody sees things in the same way. That is why I' m asking YOU.
I'm looking forward to hearing your opinions.
Don't be shy!
Send a message
Search for members