This form is secure
Send a message
Search for members
This post is public
I'm asking this, cause I do not understand it at all. Compared to my flickr account I get about 10% visitors to my photo stream on ipernity, so I would expect that this roughly holds also for the views on single pictures (as it does for comments or faves). And in the first view days it really does. I got some visits from my contacts and some anonymous visitors. Than the number of daily views drops down. Okay, that's reasonable and I can observe the same on flickr.
But while the number of daily views drops down to something between 0 and 5 on flickr, I still god dozens of anonymous views on my pictures every day. There are pictures in my stream with almost no comments but 1000 views after little more than one month! On average it's something like 20-30 views per day and picture.
I can't believe that this is real traffic, cause where should that people come from? Of course not from inside ipernity, cause in that case the quota of non-anonymous visitors should be higher (but that's almost zero). And I don't think that they come from search engines like google, cause ipernite's page rank is much lower than flickr's and even on flickr one get only something like 30% visitors via search engines.
The only thing I can imagine are search robots or just an error in the counters... Anyway it would be nice to have like on flickr a statistic function to see in more detail how people are coming to your stream.
Дон Андреpro says:
www.ipernity.com/blog/19240/54049
manganite replies:
--
Seen in manganite home page (?)
nottiestylepro says:
manganite replies:
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
nottiestylepro replies:
Chris82pro replies:
nottiestylepro replies:
-mcb says:
manganite replies:
Virtual Lover 1™pro says:
when i look at the back of my stream i'm astonished too...the number of views go up on the back pages...this has never happened on any other stream on any other site i've ever had.
i don't get it either -and would like an explanation.
peace, josie
manganite replies:
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
Annjin says:
manganite replies:
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
Annjin replies:
Yeah, one is perhaps a little - I don't know - but "naive" about the view counts; I just took it for granted that it was actual visits. But maybe its not so? What are the visit count actually? Hmmmm... yes, its interesting indeed and something to ponder about. And I would like to have a answer from the iper team too ;)
manganite replies:
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
Annjin replies:
Chris82pro says:
manganite replies:
But that seems not to hold here. I have pictures with less than 5% (maybe even less than 1%) non-anonymous visitors, while (judging from my contacts and the visitors of my main page) almost all members (or at least the vast majority) are not anonymous.
And if I compare my total photo views to the number of visitors to my stream, than it's something like 10-15:1, so every visitor would look at 10-15 pictures. On flickr it's 3:1. And I see nothing that would let me imagine why people would look at more pictures on ipernity than on flickr.
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
Дон Андреpro replies:
Olherpro says:
manganite replies:
Blogger glaube ich nicht, der müsste selbst schon megapopulär sein. Google glaube ich auch nicht, da finden sich wenn überhaupt nur meine flickr-Bilder und die haben bei weiten nicht soviel google-Besucher.
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
Дон Андреpro replies:
manganite replies:
Zieht man jedoch die anonymen davon ab, bleibt kaum was davon über , vielleicht 5%, eher weniger. Außerdem müsste es dann mehr Kommentare oder faves geben, jedenfalls wenn man es mit flickr vergleicht. In jedem Fall müsste dann aber auch die Zahl der Besucher meines Photostreams höher sein.
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
wolfgang b. replies:
schöne grüsse aus bregenz
manganite replies:
Natürlich hast Du recht, wenn Du sagst, der ganze Statistikkram ist nicht so wichtig. Aber trotzdem, es freut und motiviert mich, wenn ich sehe, dass Leute sich meine Bilder anschauen. Aber was nützt mir das, wenn ich den Zahlen, die unter meinen Bildern stehen, nicht echt, bzw. nicht von echten Besuchern stammen? Gar nix. Deshalb wäre es mir einfach wichtig, zu sehen, wie diese Zahlen zumindest in etwa zu verstehen sind.
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
wolfgang b. replies:
aber egal, zuerst kommt die fotografie...
manganite replies:
Deshalb sind Vergleiche zwischen Bildern von verschiedenen Leute nach solchen Popularitätskriterien, wie views oder comments auch ziemlich verzert. Aber innerhlab meiner eigenen Bilder ist das wieder etwas anders, da freut es mich dann wieder, wenn eines besonders gut ankommt und manchmal bin ich dann auch ehrlich enttäuscht, wenn sich kein Schwein für ein Bild zu interessieren scheint...
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
Tristan says:
manganite replies:
Дон Андреpro replies:
Iljuschinpro replies:
nottiestylepro says:
Why don't you post this question to the discussion on Unofficial ipernity Ideas and Wish Group ?
Maybe other people have same questions and curious to know where the visitors come from.
Tristan replies:
nottiestylepro says:
@Tristan
Do you mind if I add this blog as one of reply to 11565?
Like..."I agree that idea of......, Here is the blog related with this post..."
Only 2 replies there and I think people speak out more here....;-))
manganite replies:
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
Tristan replies:
Roberto Ballerini - travelingpro says:
--
Seen in robertoballerini home page (?)