Dear ipernity-team,
ipernity is a good place.
But I have some questions:
Why is it allowed, that user can show here stolen images ('netfinds')?
Why is it allowed, that user can show here candid shots (where are the personal rights from the people on this pictures)?
And, why close ipernity accounts with artful pictures (primary accounts with nude males)?
Best regards
Knut W.
(excuse my bad english)
Heute mal wieder gespendet. Ärzte ohne Grenzen - Médecins sans Frontières.
-
Heute mal wieder 100€ gespendet, nachdem ich u.a. viele Jahre Ärzte ohne Grenzen auch monatlich unte…
-
August 16, 2010
Goodbye facebook...
-
:-)
I don't like the behavior of facebook...
-
May 17, 2010
See all articles...
With...
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone (public). -
All rights reserved
-
2 246 visits
open letter to ipernity
darkroom, Rrolf, Elbertinum, creAKTive and 2 other people have particularly liked this article
RSS feed- Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post.
- ipernity © 2007-2013
-
Help & Contact
|
The ipernity Team blog
|
About ipernity
|
Thanks!
|
The ipernity Club
Guide of good conduct | Group guidelines | Privacy Policy | Terms of service
ipernity mobile | ipernity for iPhone | Developers space -
Facebook
Google +
Twitter - Find us on:
- Language
- English
Go ahead Knut!
I hope you get your answers
And I hope they are not going to do their child-protcetion blah blah and empty promises routine again.
But my hopes are very thin.
Thanks for your questions.
The purpose of ipernity is to host original content. We do not accept photos or videos picked off the Web nor indeed imported pirated MP3’s or borrowed articles from the written press. Feel free to report us forbidden (your'll find a link on each document page).
About "candid shots", here's the rule: photos/video of recognizable people taken unwittingly in a private place and those taken in a public place but with people presented in a demeaning manner are prohibited. Other photos/video of recognizable people taken in a public place without their knowledge are only allowed for PRIVATE sharing.
Concerning nudity: depictions of partial or total nudity in a non-sexual context is allowed for public sharing. Everything else must be shared in private. If sexual attributes are the main subject of a photo/video (artwork or not), we consider it as "sexual".
When we face any content related problem, we use to suspend the related account, asking its member to remove such content or to change its sharing settings. Depending on the seriousness of the case or in case of recurrence, we can decide to terminate the account.
We are still working on a new rating/filtering system. We know that lots of members are waiting it. We put all our efforts into that project to release it soon.
Don't hesitate to contact us if you need further information.
Thank you for using ipernity.
Christian // ipernity Team
Herr K. has replied to Team ipernity*yawn*
Knut Photos has replied to Team ipernitythanks a lot for your answer!
About "stolen images":
I need only seconds to find stolen images.
For example, a stolen picture of Heidi Klum (photographer: Brett Ratner for the Jordache Jeans campaign) on ipernity.
Another example: You can find this photo from Bruno Bisang
http://dailyplateofcrazy.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/luxuriant-memories-of-sweet-dates-photo-by-bruno-bisang-courtesy-menstyle-dot-fr1.jpg
on ipernity...
And so on...
About "candid shots":
I think, ipernity makes advertising for such groups:
If you click on groups, you can see under "Discover those groups"
sometimes groups like:
"candid girls"
"Voyeurism"
And, what is with porn?
See groups like this:
"(Ehe-) Frauen die sich (draussen) gerne zeigen ..."
So much porn here !!!
And you close the account of Samuel B. ...?
Sorry, but I dont' understand it completely.
Personal rights and original content ist very important.
Art is important.
If you delete porn... ok. And stolen images...
I will be sad, if artists with very artful photos will go away from ipernity.
Best regards and thanks again
Knut
Rrolf has replied to Team ipernityRrolf has replied to Team ipernityPersonally I do not have the problem here with my account, due to lack of "problematic" photos, but I am affected if people I visit are affected. I even think about reactivating my flickr account, is for me no diff if some french robot censr or ami censr are active in a community, especially if they do not have one eye to the quality of pictures they block upon a complaint of someone surfing around in ipernity.
Seems for me too, that those people which might have problems with admins eliminate the admin problem by running their own system. In fact layouts for photo blog systems are often better presenting artistic pictures than here in a "stream" and with those dia flash-boxes without great possibility to layout those flash-boxes. Rests the problem, that you loose the community if you shut down your flickr or ipernity account completely. And it rests the problem, that they were so quite happy to have a refugee for all flickr-pissed-people. They should have been aware that people fleeing from flickr are not those which post always flowers with bumblebees, for christ's sake! In june I have to renew my pro account, dear ipernity staff out there!
Edit: 13 minutes earlier there was the post from ip up there. Again: To do not care about a admin decision what is sexual and what not (which might never be hunky-dory for all participants), we need this filtering system. Fix this and fix it fast, because this is the main problem here.
Par contre je trouve dommage que les photos de rue ne soient plus visible qu'en privé...je parle des "bonnes photos" prise au grand angle, et pas au 500mm par des apprentis "papparazzi"...
J'espère que tu ne quitteras pas iper...les ipernitiens perdraient un bon photographe.
Pascal.V
und warum wurde mein account gesperrt mit der begründung das genau dies nicht erlaubt ist ?
nun gut ... dann lade ich gleich heute noch wieder klassische männerakte hoch ... leider wird dann mein account sicher wieder gesperrt ...
Das ist aber dann auch Auslegungssache......
Samuel B. has replied to bildundmehr.de - Mar…so, und genau daran habe ich mich gehalten und im zweifelsfall selbstzensur betrieben und sie nur noch freunde / familie zugängich gemacht. warum dann die sperrung?
entweder waren die sperrungen von creaktive und mir so was wie reiner zufall / betriebsunfall oder dann doch mit einer gewissen absicht, die durch die antwort oben aber wieder karikiert wird.
*Reinhard* has replied to Samuel B.Was die "geklauten" Bilder betrifft so geht der Kampf dagegen schon seit dem Start von Ip, als Standardantwort kommt bei einer Meldung an Ip, man kann nur etwas unternehmen wenn sich der Fotograf selbst bei ihnen meldet und nachweist das das Bild von ihm ist...
Ip... die zu kurze Decke wird von einem Problem zum anderen gezogen aber es gibt nirgends Lösungen.
ne pourrait-il pas etre permit de ne pouvoir etre vu, au choix, que par des membres dûment enregistrés ou par tous les publics.
une personne malintentionnée peut très bien se servir de nos contacts pour semer le trouble .
les réponse d'iper sont souvent soit evasives soit inapropriées.....
Knut ,pour les photos volées, si tu enlèves les membres qui ne font pas de photos qui leur appartiennent ici tu enleves d'ici tous les gens qui sont venus pour parler quand "yahoo 360 et autres site de chat " ont fermés.
beaucoup ici ne font pas de photo :-((
*Reinhard* has replied to IljuschinSign-in to post a comment.