Aref Nammari (goplayer) Published on August 22, 2009
by Aref Nammari (goplayer)

Aref Nammari (goplayer)'s blog

Browse posts
Ommi -- امي
Posted on September 26, 2009
2 comments (latest 8 weeks ago)
Comandante Che Guevara
Posted on September 26, 2009
website update
Posted on September 19, 2009
14 comments (latest 2 months ago)
No Celebration of Occupation -- Naomi Klein on Democracy Now
Posted on September 15, 2009
1 comment (latest 2 months ago)
Time for Boycott
8 comments (latest 3 months ago)
Bookstore destroyed
Posted on July 5, 2009
5 comments (latest 4 months ago)
Prevented from Leaving to Study
Posted on July 4, 2009
1 comment (latest 4 months ago)
Buying Access
Posted on July 3rd, 2009
Israel Attacks Boat Kidnaps Human Rights Workers
Posted on July 1st, 2009
4 comments (latest 4 months ago)

More information

This post is public
All rights reserved
  1. Read 193 times

Time for Boycott

Saturday August 22, 2009 at 01:36PM


Time to boycott Israel

For the sake of our children, I am convinced that an international boycott is the only way to save Israel from itself

Neve Gordon

Israeli newspapers this summer are filled with angry articles about the push for an international boycott of Israel. Films have been withdrawn from Israeli film festivals, Leonard Cohen is under fire around the world for his decision to perform in Tel Aviv and Oxfam has severed ties with a celebrity spokeswoman, an actress who also endorses cosmetics produced in the occupied territories. Clearly, the campaign to use the kind of tactics that helped put an end to the practice of apartheid in South Africa is gaining many followers around the world.

Not surprisingly, many Israelis – even peaceniks – aren't signing on. A global boycott can't help but contain echoes of antisemitism. It also brings up questions of a double standard (why not boycott China for its egregious violations of human rights?) and the seemingly contradictory position of approving a boycott of one's own nation.

It is indeed not a simple matter for me as an Israeli citizen to call on foreign governments, regional authorities, international social movements, faith-based organisations, unions and citizens to suspend co-operation with Israel. But today, as I watch my two boys playing in the yard, I am convinced that it is the only way that Israel can be saved from itself.

I say this because Israel has reached a historic crossroads, and times of crisis call for dramatic measures. I say this as a Jew who has chosen to raise his children in Israel, who has been a member of the Israeli peace camp for almost 30 years and who is deeply anxious about the country's future.

The most accurate way to describe Israel today is as an apartheid state. For more than 42 years, Israel has controlled the land between the Jordan Valley and the Mediterranean sea. Within this region about 6 million Jews and close to 5 million Palestinians reside. Out of this population, 3.5 million Palestinians and almost half a million Jews live in the areas Israel occupied in 1967, and yet while these two groups live in the same area, they are subjected to totally different legal systems. The Palestinians are stateless and lack many of the most basic human rights. By sharp contrast, all Jews – whether they live in the occupied territories or in Israel – are citizens of the state of Israel.

The question that keeps me up at night, both as a parent and as a citizen, is how to ensure that my two children as well as the children of my Palestinian neighbours do not grow up in an apartheid regime.

There are only two moral ways of achieving this goal.

The first is the one-state solution: offering citizenship to all Palestinians and thus establishing a binational democracy within the entire area controlled by Israel. Given the demographics, this would amount to the demise of Israel as a Jewish state; for most Israeli Jews, it is anathema.

The second means of ending our apartheid is through the two-state solution, which entails Israel's withdrawal to the pre-1967 borders (with possible one-for-one land swaps), the division of Jerusalem and a recognition of the Palestinian right of return with the stipulation that only a limited number of the 4.5 million Palestinian refugees would be allowed to return to Israel, while the rest could return to the new Palestinian state.

Geographically, the one-state solution appears much more feasible because Jews and Palestinians are already totally enmeshed; indeed, "on the ground," the one-state solution (in an apartheid manifestation) is a reality. Ideologically, the two-state solution is more realistic because fewer than 1% of Jews and only a minority of Palestinians support binationalism.

For now, despite the concrete difficulties, it makes more sense to alter the geographic realities than the ideological ones. If at some future date the two peoples decide to share a state, they can do so, but currently this is not something they want.

So if the two-state solution is the way to stop the apartheid state, then how does one achieve this goal?

I am convinced that outside pressure is the only answer. Over the last three decades, Jewish settlers in the occupied territories have dramatically increased their numbers. The myth of the united Jerusalem has led to the creation of an apartheid city where Palestinians aren't citizens and lack basic services. The Israeli peace camp has gradually dwindled so that today it is almost nonexistent, and Israeli politics is moving more and more to the extreme right.

It is therefore clear to me that the only way to counter the apartheid trend in Israel is through massive international pressure. The words and condemnations from the Obama administration and the European Union have yielded no results, not even a settlement freeze, let alone a decision to withdraw from the occupied territories.

I consequently have decided to support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement that was launched by Palestinian activists in July 2005 and has since garnered widespread support around the globe. The objective is to ensure that Israel respects its obligations under international law and that Palestinians are granted the right to self-determination.

In Bilbao, Spain, in 2008, a coalition of organisations from all over the world formulated the 10-point campaign meant to pressure Israel in a "gradual, sustainable manner that is sensitive to context and capacity". For example, the effort begins with sanctions on and divestment from Israeli firms operating in the occupied territories, followed by actions against those that help sustain and reinforce the occupation in a visible manner. Along similar lines, artists who come to Israel to draw attention to the occupation are welcome, while those who just want to perform are not.

Nothing else has worked. Putting massive international pressure on Israel is the only way to guarantee that the next generation of Israelis and Palestinians – my two boys included – does not grow up in an apartheid regime.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/21/israel-international-boycott

8 Comments / add your comment?

annikken says:
Clearly, the campaign to use the kind of tactics that helped put an end to the practice of apartheid in South Africa is gaining many followers around the world.

But the Apartheid in South Africa was a much more "clear-cut case" than the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is (primarily a racial one), hence making it easier to people to oppose apartheid in South-Africa. I mean, in the latter there's so much more clutter to the case; be it religious, political or people mixing their country's internal affairs (immigration, among other things) with the conflict... that it over-shadows the apartheid side of it.

For a boycott to be effective - that is, make as many as possible join so they can, in the end, put pressure on their regimes to boycott - I think that one must focus on one issue at time. No?
Posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
Aref Nammari (goplayer) replies:
Yes. You are correct: one must focus on one issue. The boycott is of Israeli institutions benefiting from and helping to maintain the status quo of occupation and oppression. Israel will not change its policies unless there is a massive international pressure on it as Neve Gordon writes.
Posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
Danielapro says:
Thanks, Aref !
Posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
Midwesternstock ©pro says:
"The words and condemnations from the Obama administration and the European Union have yielded no results, not even a settlement freeze, let alone a decision to withdraw from the occupied territories."

What words of condemnation?

I agree none the less.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mK9FqWhAN0Y

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dy-60zSKiGE
Posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
Midwesternstock © edited this comment 3 months ago.
Aref Nammari (goplayer) replies:
Sorry for the belated response--just got back from travel. Words of timid rebuke is more like it. Nonetheless the conclusion that boycott -- a massive popular movement-- is the only way to put pressure on Israel and other governments to stop their policies of Apartheid and occupation or support thereof.
Thanks for the links--will watch.
Posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
Midwesternstock ©pro replies:
Understood completely, hope your travels went well! I sent you a very interesting article by Petras. Hope you will respond, i think i will post it after i have re read it.
Posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
Aref Nammari (goplayer) replies:
Yes. I have seen the article just before leaving work and have not had a chance to read it yet. However, from the first two paragraphs I have quickly gone through I have to say that I do agree with Petras in a very general sense. One comment I would have for Petras is that he should be very careful about conflating Zionist with Jewish--the two are not one and the same despite the fact that Zionists claim to speak in the name of all Jews, not all Jews agree. Another comment is the use of the expression "Jewish supporters of Israel". The power of the Zionist lobby is not maintained by the Jewish citizens of the US but by the willing sellout of congressmen and women as well as the coincidence of policies of the US with those of Israel. I still maintain that the tail does not wag the dog!!!
Posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
Aref Nammari (goplayer) edited this comment 3 months ago.

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...