Anyone else noticed that the 35mm equivalence value displayed by ipernity for Canon APS-C dSLRs (300d, 350d, 400d, 10d, 20d, 30d, 40d) appears to have the wrong multiplier.
The crop multiplier for these models is 1.6x, yet the values shown imply a multiplier of 4.Y x where Y varies considerably.
It's not really a big deal, just odd.
Send a message
Search for members
Michaelpro says:
10 -> 15.6
50 -> 78.1
200->312.5
Maybe just send a mail to someone from the IP team?
David de Groot replies:
I've noticed that maybe it might be something to do with Adobe software. I shoot raw and process in Lightroom and I've seen other photos processed in Photoshop that exhibit the same odd behaviour.
I wonder if Adobe's Camera Raw routines muck up the multiplier in the exif information....
Michaelpro replies:
David de Groot replies:
David de Groot says:
The EXIF header contains the "Scale Factor To 35mm Equivalent" field on both jpg and raw files directly from the camera. On my 400D the value is 1.6
Files exported from Lightroom do not change the value of this field.
Files exported from Canon's Digital Photo Professional (ver 3) don't change the value of this field.
Files converted in Photoshop CS3 don't change the value of this field.
Therefore, it must be something in the Ipernity upload algorithm that's mucking up this field in the EXIF information. Most odd really. Not in the least bit important, just weird.
Ulrich says:
David de Groot replies:
Ulrich replies:
David de Groot replies:
teejaybee says:
David de Groot replies:
Whereas the 40D is $1499. That $1500 difference is an L lens...
Mind you, the 5D is not fully weather sealed either, so the only advantage over the 40D is the full frame sensor. The 40D has partial weather sealing, anti-dust system, live-view (I'm undecided on this, although it could be handy for macro focussing) and 14bit colour.
David de Groot says: