David de Groot Published on October 12, 2007
by David de Groot

David de Groot's blog

Browse posts
Gallery Showing - 19/2/2008 to 29/2/2008
Posted on February 22, 2008
12 comments (latest 21 months ago)
110 film
Posted on December 1st, 2007
3 comments (latest 20 months ago)
Scanner Woes
Posted on October 29, 2007
21 comments (latest 20 months ago)
Portfolio!
Posted on October 21, 2007
14 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Canon EXIF info on Ipernity
12 comments (latest 2 years ago)
RedBubble
Posted on September 3rd, 2007
19 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Of Visiting Photographers and Photo Exhibitions
Posted on September 3rd, 2007
2 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Astronomical Events
Posted on August 10, 2007
16 comments (latest 2 years ago)
QR does not like me...
Posted on July 25, 2007
28 comments (latest 2 years ago)

More information

This post is public
All rights reserved
  1. Read 499 times

Canon EXIF info on Ipernity

Friday October 12, 2007 at 04:28AM

Anyone else noticed that the 35mm equivalence value displayed by ipernity for Canon APS-C dSLRs (300d, 350d, 400d, 10d, 20d, 30d, 40d) appears to have the wrong multiplier.

The crop multiplier for these models is 1.6x, yet the values shown imply a multiplier of 4.Y x  where Y varies considerably.

It's not really a big deal, just odd.

12 Comments / add your comment?

Michaelpro says:
Hmm, this doesn't seem to apply to the XTi model... I have:
10 -> 15.6
50 -> 78.1
200->312.5

Maybe just send a mail to someone from the IP team?
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
David de Groot replies:
You're shooting jpeg aren't you ?

I've noticed that maybe it might be something to do with Adobe software. I shoot raw and process in Lightroom and I've seen other photos processed in Photoshop that exhibit the same odd behaviour.

I wonder if Adobe's Camera Raw routines muck up the multiplier in the exif information....
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Michaelpro replies:
I am shooting RAW and use the Canon tools to convert to JPG. I think the multiplier is something that IP does maybe with a lookup table for different models.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
David de Groot replies:
Hmmm, interesting... You'd think though if it were a lookup table the results would be the same across all cameras of the same model though.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
David de Groot says:
Ok, I've just done some tests as this has me somewhat curious.

The EXIF header contains the "Scale Factor To 35mm Equivalent" field on both jpg and raw files directly from the camera. On my 400D the value is 1.6

Files exported from Lightroom do not change the value of this field.
Files exported from Canon's Digital Photo Professional (ver 3) don't change the value of this field.
Files converted in Photoshop CS3 don't change the value of this field.

Therefore, it must be something in the Ipernity upload algorithm that's mucking up this field in the EXIF information. Most odd really. Not in the least bit important, just weird.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Ulrich says:
I've seen the same. For photos made with the 5D the value should be the actual focal length of the lens but it is far bigger. I have not tested but I also hink it must have to do with the way Ipernity handles EXIF data.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
David de Groot replies:
'tis very odd, that's for sure. Speaking of 5D's, I notice some fairly substantial price drops on that piece of kit recently - down to less than $3k (Au) now. Still too much for me though.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Ulrich replies:
The new models 1Ds Mark III, 1D Mark III and 40D as well as the anticipation of a replacement for the 5D that goes with it will make the price drop even more I guess.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
David de Groot replies:
I'm thinking of adding the 40D to my menagerie when I get new lenses, as it's price has also dropped radically of late.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
teejaybee says:
I wonder if you can get refurbished 5D's in Australia... A 5D is my dream camera - full frame and weather sealing, and not hugely bulky like the professional series cameras.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
David de Groot replies:
Well the 5D body is now down to $2950 new at Discount Digital in Sydney - d-d-photographics.com/canoneos5d.htm

Whereas the 40D is $1499. That $1500 difference is an L lens...

Mind you, the 5D is not fully weather sealed either, so the only advantage over the 40D is the full frame sensor. The 40D has partial weather sealing, anti-dust system, live-view (I'm undecided on this, although it could be handy for macro focussing) and 14bit colour.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
David de Groot says:
Hey, the exif "35mm equivalence" field is now fixed - or at least on my latest shot (I've not checked older ones yet).
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...