Carsten Published on June 26, 2007
by Carstenpro

Carsten's blog

Browse posts
Back
Posted on July 16, 2007
10 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Out Of Office...
Posted on July 8, 2007
8 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Grenoble » Paris
Posted on July 1st, 2007
11 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Impact of Cropping
Posted on June 28, 2007
8 comments (latest 2 years ago)
The largest panorama I stitched ever...
6 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Playing with the API
Posted on June 23, 2007
22 comments (latest 17 months ago)
What I really and most wish for Ipernity...
Posted on June 23, 2007
7 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Coming to Grenoble
Posted on June 21, 2007
1 comment (latest 2 years ago)
OMG, staff is working hard and fast!
Posted on June 21, 2007
18 comments (latest 2 years ago)

More information

This post is public
All rights reserved
  1. 1 person added it to his favorites
  2. Read 729 times

The largest panorama I stitched ever...

Tuesday June 26, 2007 at 09:11PM

Ostragehege, Alberthafen, City Centre, Friedrichstadt, ...

Ok, it is over a year old but the numbers are still impressive.

  • 90 shots (maybe 88 used here) at 83mm focal length
  • final cropped panorama is 77624 px × 3072 px
  • stitched using hugin with the nona engine, blended with enblend
  • nona did take about 3 hours (this just morphs the images)
  • blending them using enblend did take about 3 days (!)
  • in the first run I did forget to activate LZW compression for the tifs created by nona, so each one was about 1.2 GB and my hard disk was filled up, with LZW it's just about 24 MB per pic as there're big transparent areas
  • the final LZW compressed tif is about 600 MB, loaded in Gimp to crop, Gimp needs about 3.5 GB
  • the uploaded scaled down JPEG version just is about 2.5 MB

So is it feasible? No! Just a test and next time I'll use a smaller focal length... The problem is not only the stitching time, but it's hard to work with these many images in hugin (and I assume in any other stitching program). Because of that this stitch isn't perfect by far (usually I'd have defined more vertical and horizontal lines), but I don't care for this one.

It would be interesting to see how long it takes on modern hardware (more RAM, dual core)... :D

6 Comments / add your comment?

NicoleB says:
Das ist wohl auch das laengste, das ich je gesehen habe. WOW!
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink / translate )
Schneller2000 says:
net schelcht net Schlecht. Mein breitestes war so um die 35k Pixel, glaube ich. Aber für F****r habe ich es immer auf 10.000 herunter gerechnet. Und derzeit, wenn ich mal ein Panorama mache, versuche ich es in ca 5900x1060 Pixel zu pressen. Sozusagen ein Standard meiner Seits :) -> okay, mit 360° Panos geht das schlecht, da immer was verloren geht.
Denn gerade das amcht die 360°Panos aus, ungehöre Breite und detailreiche, also weiter so ;)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink / translate )
Doomshammer says:
Very impressive! Did you already try Panorama Factory to build your Panoramas? Maybe you could do a benchmark to see which software is faster/less work.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Carstenpro replies:
Hm, I'm using Linux exclusively at home. So hugin is the only good choice I know of...
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Doomshammer replies:
True. Though I got autostich running with WINE - but that's actually not a performance advantage ;-)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
stip says:
> It would be interesting to see how long it takes on modern hardware (more RAM, dual core)... :D
give it a try ;-)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...