Bikini Pics Dude Published on October 24, 2009
by Bikini Pics Dude

Bikini Pics Dude's blog

Browse posts
China: poisoning and killing themselves and their children in exchange for soon-to-be worthless paper
Posted on October 30, 2009
1 comment (latest 4 weeks ago)
Amateur paysites still suck.
4 comments (latest 9 days ago)
Thongs at the beach
Posted on September 29, 2008
2 comments (latest 13 months ago)
Free speech is under assault in Italy
Posted on September 19, 2008
1 comment (latest 6 months ago)

More information

This post is public
Attribution + no Derivs
  1. Read 165 times

Amateur paysites still suck.

Saturday October 24, 2009 at 05:35PM

I just re-visited a certain paysite (southern charms) yesterday looking for potential eye-candy. They have something like 800 "models" there, but, in my opinion, they suck for two reasons: (1) No quality control on photos that are uploaded. Example: you pay the $14.95 to become a member of one other their models sites, and you just don't know what you're going to get. It might be a guy in a trailer with a $100 point-and-shoot camera. Yes, you can still get good photos with these things, but that requires things like good light, composition, etc. which many of the boyfriends and husbands of the "models" simply don't understand. This lack of quality was apparent in the SC thumbnails, but is also confirmed in all the "web finds" I've found from SC on flickr, etc. (2) Automatic rebilling. You pay the $14.95, and it keeps billing your credit card every month until you cancel. What happens if you sign up, pay the $14.95, then immediately cancel. Hopefully, your subscription continues until the end of the month, but they don't say that in their terms of service.

After a quick glance through all 800 or so of their female models, I came to the conclusion that only about 1% actually have photos worth paying for. The rest, while they may look good, their husbands are uneducated as photographers. So you have lots of crappy photos of pretty ladies: poor light is the number one problem and poor composition is number two. For example, in the butt shots, most of the models are not looking at the camera at all. You don't see their eyes at all. Go to SI, etc., and this sort of photo is very uncommon. On SC, it's all over the place. Needless to say, I didn't sign up and don't plan on it anytime soon. Add to that all those models who call themselves "BBW", then when you see their thumbnails, their butt and belly are covered in most. Guys who want to see BBW's don't want them covering up the big parts.

Whatever is your fancy, I suggest you not waste your time or money on sites like SC. We have far better skilled and equipped photographers here on IP than the vast majority of the SC models's partners.



4 Comments / add your comment?

Frayed ends says:
i know this site. and yeah pretty much any girl can sign up to be a model. The thing is, i figure that whatever the girl has to offer or what type of look she has, someone out there will be into her. There are a coupole girls i do like, but the quality is really bad. on one of them. i dont know if they even look at the shots before posting. As for covering up the essentials, things become uncovered once you pay. Protect the kiddies.

One girl who is worth the cash is angelique xxx. but she has her own site as well. And she does customs which is awesome. if only that money tree would grow.
Posted 4 weeks ago. ( permalink )
PF007 says:
I've enjoyed trolling this site for probably a decade now. I have my favorites, I look for their daily updates, I enjoy. There are some super-fine amateur-looking women on there, really something for everyone (and some for no one!) Once I paid to subscribe to a model's feed, she rarely posted during the months I was subscribed...that was that. Another time, I had a nice email chain going with one of them. Nothing came of it - hell, she and I were both "taken." About 2 years ago, I found a site that had tons of downloadable rar files of some good models. I enjoyed what I could; it's since been shut down. So be it. I enjoy the free portion of it for what it's worth. You're right tho, why pay $15 to see some of them, especially those who's shots are poor quality!?
Posted 4 weeks ago. ( permalink )
UCwhatICpro says:
I've never paid to see photos of women on the net. Don't know why anyone does.
Posted 2 weeks ago. ( permalink )
olderwomen admirerpro says:
Southern Charms is one of the best Amateur models site on the web ! This site is known and appreciated worldwide. But I agree 100% with Bikini Pics Dude, a large part of the photographers don't know what a HQ photo is or should be. They just don't care very much about the quality aspect, that is, light, composition, angles etc. When I watch photos on Internet, the first thing I search for is QUALITY, then a good woman to watch. This kind of sites have thousand of paying subscriptions per year, they earn a lot of money, but their quality standards sometimes are really poor and ridiculous. I have my own paysite and I earn very little money on a year basis, but I offer for sure a quality level much higher than SC or other similar sites. I could not post creepy photos on my pages, even if someone would ask me to do it or pay me for doing that, it is something about the nature of the person you are and the aestetical taste a person has got. There are people on the web who strongly appreciate quality photography versus creepy nude photography, but the majority of the male users are constantly attracted from a raw nude butt photo rather than an HQ beautiful rearview !
Posted 9 days ago. ( permalink )

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...