quelques années apres la sortie du 5D
voici son concurrent
le D700 (toujours un déclic d'avance chez Nikon)
prix annoncé 2599 $ environs pour un capteur 24x36 et 12.1 Mpx etc etc etc
des infos ici
NIKON : http://www.europe-nikon.com/product/fr_FR/products/broad/1627/overview.html
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikond700/
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d700.htm
Nikon D700 Key Features
- 12.1 megapixel full-frame sensor (8.45µm pixel pitch)
- Image Sensor Cleaning (vibration) *
- ISO 200 - 6400 (with boost up to ISO 25600 and down to ISO 100)
- Also supports DX lenses, viewfinder automatically masks (5.1 megapixels with DX lens)
- 14-bit A/D conversion, 12 channel readout
- Same ultra-fast startup and shutter lag as D3
- Nikon EXPEED image processor (Capture NX processing and NR algorithms, lower power)
- New Kevlar / carbon fibre composite shutter with 150,000 exposure durability *
- Multi-CAM3500FX Auto Focus sensor (51-point, 15 cross-type, more vertical coverage)
- Auto-focus tracking by color (using information from 1005-pixel AE sensor)
- 95% coverage, 0.72x magnification viewfinder *
- Auto-focus calibration (fine-tuning), fixed body or up to 20 separate lens settings
- Scene Recognition System (uses AE sensor, AF sensor)
- Picture Control image parameter presets
- 5 frames per second continuous with auto-focus tracking*
- Optional MB-D10 Battery Pack (same as D300), increases burst rate to 8 fps *
- UDMA compatible single CF card slot *
- 3.0" 922,000 pixel LCD monitor
- Live View with either phase detect (mirror up/down) or contrast detect Auto Focus
- Virtual horizon indicates if camera is level (like an aircraft cockpit display)
- HDMI HD video output
- 'Active D-Lighting' (adjusts metering as well as applying D-Lighting curve)
- Detailed 'Control Panel' type display on LCD monitor, changes color in darkness
- Magnesium alloy body with connections and buttons sealed against moisture
- Improved Info display on main screen *
* Different to D3
"from the site KENROCKWELL"
Recommendations top
Specifications Accessories Performance Comparisons Recommendations
If you need to shoot today, get a readily available D3 or D300, since it will be a few weeks until anyone gets their hands on a D700.
The only thing you're getting for $1,200 more than a D300 is much better high-ISO performance and a green light to buy even more expensive ultra-ultra wide lenses. For most people, I wouldn't bother, or I'd step up all the way to the much faster and fully professional D3.
If you're shooting sports and action, the D3 is still your camera. If you're shooting landscapes, the D3X (not yet public) or Canon 5D is better.
Honest: if I need landscape image quality, the Canon 5D beats the D3 and costs and weighs much less. If I want speed for sports, action and news, the D3 has far faster AF and frame rates than any of these. The D700 or D3 aren't the cameras for landscapes; that's the 5D or D3X.
Lens Suggestions
See my Nikon D3 Lens Suggestions.
Personally, for landscapes and weird stuff, the 14-24mm is what I use all day. For photos of family and friends in any light without flash, the 50mm f/1.4 AF-D is unbeaten. For a tele, pros use the 70-200mm VR, and you might prefer the much lighter (and one-third as expensive) 70-300mm VR. Personally I grab the 80-400mm VR for its extra reach, but its AF is too slow for action.
Nikon's PR shows the D700 with the 24-120mm VR. It's an OK lens, and Nikon's closest to a do-everything FX zoom, but it's among Nikon's least sharp lenses.
I'm hearing that Nikon will be kitting these with the 24-120mm VR. That's OK, but not likely to get you the sharpness and low-light sensitivity for which most people want a D700. The 24-120 VR just happens to have the price Nikon thinks you're likely to pay, and specs that seem attractive, but it's not the lens I'd get.
When I got my D3, the first lens I pulled out for general walking around was the 24-120 VR based on those very same presumptions, but I didn't like it. The vignetting is obvious at 120mm (unknown if the correction of the D700 fixes this).
Few if any pros use mid-range zooms, like the 24-120. Most use a wide zoom and a tele zoom, and maybe drop a 50mm in their pocket for low light. When I use a midrange zoom with my D3, I kid you not, I use the cheap plastic 28-80 G if I want sharp results, great macro and instant autofocus (faster than the 24-120 VR). I use the 28-200 G if I want to cover all focal lengths very sharply and have decent macro, but the AF of the 28-200 G isn't all that fast. Neither of the 28-80 G and 28-200 G are made anymore, which is why Nikon isn't pushing them. Each is a cheap plastic lens, but with stellar performance.
Hint: I never use a midrange zoom. For almost all my walking around and family photos, I use the 50mm f/1.4 D. The fast f/stop lets me stop action in any sort of darkness, all with clean, creamy and sharp images at the high ISOs so easy for Nikon's FX cameras.
Forget DX lenses. You'll get much sharper results and save $1,200 by using them on a D300 instead!
thanks to Stefanie Carle und Tuvalu for the link :D
Shine on
Send a message
Search for members
StarScreampro says:
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
Stefanie Carle - aka se_kwienpro says:
--
Seen in stefaniecarle home page (?)
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
Wiki Tangopro says:
I wait for the EOS 5D Mark II
MDR
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
Man-O-net says:
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
Roberto Ballerini - travelingpro says:
Tu m'as dit que l'Italie avait Nikon comme sponsor: tu ne t'es pas aperçu que c'était l'unique Nikon presente? Tous les zooms étaient gris-Canon, tous les topheurs étaient Canon, ... et meme les goals de l'Espagne semblaient sortir d'un canon... ;-))
--
Seen in a user's home page (?)
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
tu sais quoi ?
c'est vrai je n'ai pas regardé !
je n'aime pas le foot !
bajy says:
Romainpro says:
Doomshammerpro says:
tuvalupro says:
But I'm really warming up to a Nikon FX-setup somewhen in the future...
light...
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
we all have our lil problems ;-))
lol
:)
tuvalupro replies:
I looked for some lenses...
12-24/2.8 24-70/2.8 70-200/2.8 VR
105 Mikro VR
85/1.4 (Ok I think the 85/1.8 would do as well)
35/2 hm... with FX they are all very attractive
Ok, that will certainly take some very good time, before I can afford all this...
But it looks really attractive...
light...
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
and so few time to learn ...
tuvalupro replies:
the 17-35/2.8 and the 70-200/2.8
plus either 60 or 105 micro nikkor
and 1.8/85
would suite my needs very well (Ok, still not really cheap
light...
Den's says:
allez les vaches à lait, on passe à la caisse !!! :)))
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
pendant que les autres bavent derriere les vaches :)))
|||||||||pro says:
plus il est récent ..
plus t'as un gros zoom ..
..................... plus tes photos sont belles !!
on est dans la merde quand on a pas de pognon c'est la loose !!!
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
depuis le temps ...
Ma' pom says:
et de gros zoom ?
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro says:
MESDAMES !
la taille de ma bite va tres bien !
on vous fait pas chier avec vos essayages de godasses à pas de prix ou du 14ie sac à main
Alors
pour une fois qu'on parle d'un truc qu'on achetera jamais parce que ca coute le prix de votre robe de mariée ou des réparations de voiture ou encore du billet de voyage que vous voulez faire en couple absolument pour revenir plus bronzée que la voisine ....
LA BARBE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|||||||||pro replies:
Roberto Ballerini - travelingpro replies:
TRRRRRRANQUILLO, ANTONIO, TRRRRRANQUILLO!!!
--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
tuvalupro says:
light...
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
and i'm impatient to view this monster :)
hope you're ok
see you !
shine on :)
tuvalupro replies:
Yes I was happy to see they were passing by in Dresden with the camera. Now I'm really looking forward to buying it some day...
I think the difference in termsof handling isn't that big compared to the D300.
The viewinder though really is great! Finally a DSLR with a similar viewfinder to my LX! (yeah OK, there's the 5D and the D3...)
And it might be voodoo, but to me the pictures of the FX-sensor seem to be better than those of the DX-sensors. And as soon as it comes to low-light, the difference becomes obvious...
light...
...and greetings over to Touqet from Pirna...
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
happy you're better
shine on :)
about D700 i'll tell you my opinion after trying it :)
tuvalupro replies:
Isn't there some sort of Roadshow in France too?
light...
Bigoode [Frozen account]pro replies:
don't know, don't have time, but i'll read several professionals reviews to have a fair idea
friendly
:)
tuvalupro replies:
So the reviews will have to do... ;)
Do you know this one?
light...