Doomshammer Published on July 20, 2007
by Doomshammer

Doomshammer's blog

Browse posts
[Updated] The Hooters and The Urge - live @ LMH
Posted on July 31, 2007
Song of the day
Posted on July 30, 2007
4 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Heute isses komisch...
Posted on July 28, 2007
7 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Nicht vergessen!
Posted on July 25, 2007
6 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Advantages of HDR
11 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Koelner Lichter - Wo kann man am besten Fotografieren?
Posted on July 14, 2007
17 comments (latest 2 years ago)
My new tripod :-)
Posted on July 14, 2007
4 comments (latest 2 years ago)
Pixlr goes Ipernity :-)
Posted on June 25, 2007
Pro now :)
Posted on June 24, 2007

More information

This post is public
All rights reserved
  1. Read 542 times

Advantages of HDR

Friday July 20, 2007 at 05:08PM

In the comments to this photo, I have been asked by grapf why I've choosen HDR for this shot. As you may notice, it isn't too apparent that this is a HDR composition (compared to other HDR compositions). Well, personally I am not a big fan of these "overrealistic" HDRs - you know.. this kind of HDR where cars look like plastic - but that's just my personal opinion. I rather use HDR to enhance the dynamic range of my photos, so that you can see more details and have better light and stuff. So I try to build my HDRs as realistic as possible.

To give you a brief overview/comparison, I've uploaded the "normal" exposure to the above mentioned HDR composition:

Color celebration // Non-HDR
Color celebration // Non-HDR


As you can see, the shot isn't to bad at all. But some parts are (at least for my personal taste) too overexposed and the colors are looking a bit flat. Additionally I'd like to have the sky a little more dark red - just to highlight the mood and the daytime. Last but not least, the reflections on the water, are not looking so nice as well. For sure.. I could have done some raw processing to underexpose the photo a bit, but then the roofs and the skyline would fade into dark and details would disappear. As well I could do some image processing with PS to just slightly underexpose some parts of the photo, but this would be lots of work and I doubt that the result would be the same as with the HDR composition.

Now have a look at the HDR version of this shot:

Color celebration
Color celebration


As you will instantly notice, the colors are much more powerful and the reflections are way better than in the above version. The sky now has a really nice mood and shows that the sun was just setting- though the details of the roofs and the skyline are still visible. But besides of this, the most impressive enhancement of the HDR version (at least IMHO) are the colorful lights. They are not as overexposed as in the normal version but though very bright and a real eyecatcher.

So that's my point of view about HDR. I'm curious in hearing your opinions about this post and the comparsion between normal shots and HDR compositions. :-)

11 Comments / add your comment?

HarryBo73 says:
I do a lot of HDRs but never had made one when it is that dark as in your shots. I really find your comparison helpfull! I always thought about how a long exposure picture will look diferent when it is a HDR. You described exactly that.
It totally makes sense that also in this senario the HDR has the same benefit as in normal daylight.
So I will need to do a similiar shot to get my own experience with it.
Thanks for sharing!!
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Doomshammer replies:
Well, I'm glad when I was able to give you a hint :) Looking forward to see your HDRs :)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
beatmaster says:
I think, hdr is just another element of style.
Unfortunately just doing a photo "hdr-style" because it's technique and trendy is the wrong descision!
On the other hand some say (esp. in forums) that hdr isn't nessesary at all, that's also wrong ;) (overexposure is also just another element of style that could be wanted, but not by everyone)
So you're right, it's the mood a picture should have in the eyes of a photographer ... and in the digital age exposure series aren't expensive any more :)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Doomshammer replies:
I absolutelly agree. Not at all I would just build HDRs. I think HDR is a nice to have in some situations, as well as a lot of other "style elements". It always depends on the subject and the situation/mood.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Roberto Ballerini - travelingpro says:
Have you made bracketed exposures or changed the exposure on a single RAW shot? And if you bracketed, how do you managed to hide ghosting artifacts (I think the exposures were very long)?

--
Seen in a user home page (?)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Doomshammer replies:
I did 3 different exposures and combined 'em to the HDR composition. The software I am using for the HDR is able to eleminate ghosting artifacts, so that's pretty simple to handle :)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Roberto Ballerini - travelingpro replies:
Photomatix plugin in Photoshop?

--
Seen in my account recent activity (?)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Doomshammer replies:
Nop, the standalone version.
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Grapfonautpro says:
Hej, thanks a lot for this posting! :-)
I see, what you mean. The difference between with and without HDR is clear. That means I should try to take still some more shots...
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Doomshammer replies:
YAW :-) I'm looking forward to see you shots :)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
Tr1steropro says:
You're absolutely right - HDR can be a fantastic addition also for nightshots:

Ceci n'est pas New York

(3 exposures, blended using Photomatix)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...