PedjaP Published on July 31, 2007
by PedjaP

PedjaP's blog

Browse posts
Low (or lower contrast)
Posted on May 23, 2008
3 comments (latest 19 months ago)
My point of view
2 comments (latest 19 months ago)

More information

This post is public
Attribution + non Commercial + no Derivs
  1. Read 437 times

My point of view

Tuesday July 31, 2007 at 11:19PM

For me, the basic component of a photograph is light. If light doesn't work, all other components (composition, subject, expression, tone, colour, moment, movement) lose impact. Extraordinary light, on the other hand, can make the most mundane subjects special and, for the lack of a better word, unexpected.

I appreciate photographs which go beyond abilities of my ocular sensory system to perceive the world, and present it to me in a way I couldn't see it otherwise.

I love visual puns which happen all the time around us but get to be recorded only by people who seem to have 360 degree vision, lightning-fast reflexes and rare imagination.

I don't believe in photography as documentary evidence, the reality is always warped by freezing of the moment, by the compression of three dimensions into two and by the framing. Viewing a photograph is a second-hand experience of the reality in which the photo was taken and, in terms of evidence, can be described as hear-say.

Like good literature, good photography is extremely subjective, presents completely new point of view, and at the same time is totally seductive and persuasive.

What I enjoy most is the recent democratization of the medium which allows so many people to explore it and thus raise the bar for everyone, including the well established professionals. True, living off photography has never been harder, but, on the upside, look at all the great photos on sites such as ipernity, all those amazing, unique points of view. It is like the massive mining operation which not only unearths lots of gems, but at the same time, raises our expectations of what a gem should look like.

2 Comments / add your comment?

Roberto Ballerini - travelingpro says:
I agree with you with the importance of light in a shot; in effect the capture of light is what is really different between an eye and a film/camera sensor.
So there isn't great photography without great light mastery (look at Joe's or Chris' shots to have an idea of what i mean).
But I think shots can also represent reality; the example here is photojournalism or the National Geographic; it's a different form of art; in that case light is important, but timely shots are sometimes more important.

--
Seen in a user home page (?)
Posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
The Bobster says:
Roberto, I think photojournalism tries to present reality, but as PadjaP says, it's a warped reality - I'd prefer to say a bent one, or perhaps a nudged one: the photographer of an atrocity cannot remain objective, and we would consider that photographer to be just as monstrous as the perpetrators of the murder if the attempt at mere recording were a successful one. I think the only truly objective camera is a department store security device, set on automatic, functional in a limited way, and useless for seeing what is beneath the surface, or for most other purposes, really.

I think the conceit that any kind of journalism can be devoid of a point of view is a very dishonest one, and a lot of people are coming around to this - in America today, for instance, a large percentage of young people prefer to get their news about current events from comedians. Perhaps that is actually better, and as it should be.
Posted 19 months ago. ( permalink )
The Bobster edited this comment 19 months ago.

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post.

 

Català | Čeština nové | 中文 | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Ελληνικά | Français | Galego | Italiano | Nederlands | Português | More...