Find it here.
And again, he managed to say nothing with a lot of words, or did I miss something?
There's a link to the German version as well, I don't even bother....
And the newest statement from Heather (am still searching for the link)
"I just want to step in with a public service announcement:
I think we can all agree that the previous topic on this issue became unecessarily ugly and in some instances quite personally abusive towards the team.
While we're happy to entertain discussion within the forum, we're going to take a much harder line in this and other topics, removing posts that are bashy and ranty either towards fellow members of the community or the team itself.
Thanks for your consideration. "
------> which will leave it to them now again to decide what a rant is - smart people ![]()
They are getting quite talkative all off a sudden - yet another statement (or something like that)
Somebody allowed staff to talk, if it's good, I don't know - decide for yourselves.
Just for kicks, it would be fun to know how many staff are watching right now.
I think the whole team is reading this thread. We all care very much about this issue, and hope as much as any of you that a legal, reasonable solution can be found. And as we've said, we're working on it. Really, I swear. No lie. Scout's honor. Cross my heart and hope to die.
I am not trying to be flippant, but just want it to be clear to everyone that we are indeed working on it. I hope that matters to some people.
I also understand that our relative quiet in these threads lends itself to negative interpretation, like that we don't care, that we just want it to blow over, that we are greedy money bags that just want to censor Germans. It's not true. It's more like this: IANAL.
Send a message
Search for members
Roberto Ballerini - traveling pro says:
NicoleB pro replies:
I also wish, they would thinking they are smarter than everyone else.
Plus, the fact of the threat with the ranting and deletion thing in their TOS is just another way to give them an easy excuse to repeat things like the "Rebekka desaster".
*Shakes head* and starts cleaning the flickr house again... ;)
twotwentysix says:
(too long, didn't read, too much information in the forums I'll read them later)
so did they change the filters or what?
no filters are even required by the german law
www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/91468 so legally, they are overreacting
NicoleB pro replies:
Not that I care anymore ;)
GoodMoon says:
kawazu says:
NicoleB pro replies:
And China and the rest can't even protest right, because they don't get through with any pictures or they don't even know or are too used to it.
I'm tired of their crap :(
kawazu replies:
lichtmaedel replies:
NicoleB pro replies:
kawazu replies:
NicoleB pro replies:
If someone's access is blocked, HOW CAN they protest???
Doooohhhh......
Stewart Leiwakabessy replies:
hmmm (oh, I mean: check the caption with that photo)
helter-skelter in exile replies:
Stewart Leiwakabessy says:
I learned that one of my contacts has been blocked out from flickr (he is from Italy), after he got into things w/ another flickr member. It was regarding some photo that was posted, depicting Che Guevarra. But still looking into that matter, don't want to jump into conclusions. It's getting w e i r d @flickr.
NicoleB pro replies:
I didn't believe everyone either that claimed that their account was deleted without any notice, but during the times it happened, they could not all have lied.
Some of them I DID and still do believe....
ecstaticist says:
“I don’t understand how flickr could have gone along with entering into a local german setting knowing that this would be the situation (when at least from an outsiders perspective, its seems like staying out of germany would have been a perfectly fine scenario from the point of view of german users, and probably from a business point of view considering the PR damage done by this whole debacle) The lack of foresight and willingness to go into such a compromised situation just doesn’t make sense, and the lack of responses explaining the rationale for the current situation doesn’t make sense.”
I personally believe flickr staff are not in control. They are being forced to go along with head office things while trying desperately to put a good face on it. This is a natural evolution in the business world, predictable, and I am done with it.
NicoleB pro replies:
Exactly :)!
moritz™ says:
NicoleB pro replies:
moritz™ replies:
NicoleB pro replies:
airpark says:
But everybody now thinks that yahoo/flickr are stupid multinationals who did neither understand local laws nor care about respect, rights and customers. And that's apparently the truth.
NicoleB pro replies:
konomu replies:
das trifft es ganz gut.
twotwentysix says:
limone replies:
NicoleB pro replies:
NicoleB pro replies:
twotwentysix replies:
ne, ich steh auf dem schlauch....
NicoleB pro replies:
Und jeder wird seine Gruende haben.
Nachvollziehen koennen muss ich es ja nicht unbedingt.
Aber Gruende gibt es sicherlich genuegend. Nicht jedem haengt die Politik auf flickr so zum Hals raus, wie mir. Und selbst ich werde fuer eine Weile noch den kostenlosen account dort behalten, alleine schon, weil doch noch recht viele Leute dort sind.
Ob der Kontakt bestehen bleiben wird, who knows....
Das war die freundliche Variante, die erste waere mal wieder typisch "ich" gewesen. Erst schreiben, dann nachdenken und sich entschuldigen. Hey, ich koennte bei flickr arbeiten mit der Methode, ... ;)
twotwentysix replies:
ich würde mir persönlich nichts dabei denken, wenn jemand sich doch entscheidet nicht hier zu bleiben. Ich habe mein flickr account ja auch noch und es steht noch offen, was ich daraus mache.
die frage war eher die, ob es genau so eine massenwanderung zurück zu flickr geben wird, wie es sie hergegeben hat...
NicoleB pro replies:
winter*kind pro says:
jetzt muss ich wohl rausfinden gehen, ob da künftig alles wieder wie gehabt läuft. obwohl... nein, eigentlich will ich das nicht wirklich wissen, denn die entscheidung steht: der account ist eingeschläfert und bleibt es...
Blue Silver says:
I like it here, I like the guestbook and the blog and perhaps I will become a pro-member some day.
© Marco says:
www.flickr.com/groups/ipernity/discuss/72157600417492860/
NicoleB pro replies:
Hier der link direkt zur heise Meldung
NicoleB pro says:
www.flickr.com/help/forum/43626/page4/#reply242170
Nice.
Carsten pro replies:
NicoleB pro says:
BenJ - flickr staff
Right now, in the US and elsehwere, we block "restricted" content from those of a certain age (I'm not going to say the exact age because I'm not 100% positive what it is -- probably the usual magic number). It's in the FAQ.
But! As stated above: We are continuing to actively evaluate various technical options, including exploring whether there is a way we can verify users' age which would meet the very high standards set by German law, and which would offer additional choice to our members in Germany.
And him again:
Well. Sort of. Actually it's not my job. I'm a developer. All the staff who participate here in the forums do so when we have free time. It's 1AM here in California -- not exactly my normal working hours. :-)
But yah. I think we could have been better at communicating over the last week. Half of the team has been on the other side of the planet all week -- that's created some difficulties.
Here
Nice one ;)
NicoleB pro says:
[This is a little long, but I'm trying to answer a few of the more general questions and tie a few things together.]
Those of you who are asking for the internal legal arguments, letters from regulators, citations of articles in the criminal code, etc., are bound to be disappointed. This is just not going to happen.
Even if it were a reasonable thing for us to publish all of that (and it's not, for a long list of reasons) I'm also pretty sure it wouldn't help. It'd just lead to more second-guessing and armchair lawyering ("well, if Bob had already said that in his email on 6/14 at 17:23, how come Suzy asked again the next day?" or "hey! - there is no transcript of the 6:30am PST conference call from the 13th - how can we know what really happened?", etc.)
I can say that the *legal* decisions here are not mine personally: I'm not sitting in my office in California guessing at German laws, but working with local counsel in our German office (in-house and external) and elsewhere in the EU, along with German management and policy teams. This has nothing to do with anyone's religious feelings or personal prudishness and it also is not done out of ignorance of the law.
In one sense, since I'm responsible for Flickr and am in charge of how it actually operates, I could do the cowboy thing, ignore legal advice or requests from in-country management and change the filters to work however I think they should (still have to convince the team here to actual change code, but that's another story).
But what I want are good long term solutions -- that's not going to happen if we (internally) can't work together. And, after I've spent tens of hours with my best possible arguments, I have to respect what the legal and policy groups are telling me and why.
As I said earlier, it actually isn't as simple as it looks. I think most people in my shoes, with all the same knowledge that I had, would have made most of the same choices. Yes, I knew that it'd be a bit of a disaster, but I was choosing from a menu of different disasters, and I think we ended up with the smallest one.
Having said that there were a few things that we did (and myself specifically) that were totally wrong and for which I apologize: chief among them was not announcing this in advance (we were hoping we weren't going to have to) and not posting right away in the forums (this was a legal command -- as opposed to suggestion -- but since we eventually ended up saying more or less what we wanted to say in the first place, I should have just posted anyway).
So, I'm sorry for all the extra annoyance and confusion caused by the small amounts of communication. And I'm more sorry for those people who feel like "their" Flickr was harmed/destroyed/disappeated etc. in the last week. On that last topic, I'm writing another post now.
Carsten pro replies:
joe says:
airpark says:
Carsten pro replies:
NicoleB pro says:
Vogelmann pro says:
Stewart Leiwakabessy says:
More about the TOS of Ipernity
As far as I understand, Ipernity is allowed use your content as long as it refers back to your account here on Ipernity. Right?
NicoleB pro replies:
Let me check your link....
5.9 By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the Service, you grant Ipernity a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to reproduce, adapt, distribute and publish such Content through the Service, including RSS or other content feeds offered the Service, and other Ipernity services.
5.10 In addition, by submitting, posting or displaying Content which is intended to be available to the general public, you grant Ipernity a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to reproduce, adapt, distribute and publish such Content for the purpose of displaying, distributing and promoting Ipernity services.
Mh, if they use it to promote their service, ok with me, if they make money out of it, I'm not sure what to think, uff.....
Stewart Leiwakabessy says: