| November 2009 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | ||
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | ||
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | ||
| 29 | 30 | |||||||
It took me a week writing many emails back and forth with Iper staff - but I managed to get back online here.
First I was asked to remove some pictures on a teen group, for Iper staff was under the impression these pictures were of underage girls. Now I can argue about that, but since they make the rules you only have 2 options: comply or quit. And quitting was not an option, yet.
After deleting these pictures, there was another request. I had to delete a complete album of a 22yo FULLY CLOTHED girl (ok, sometimes there was a peek of underwear...), and a picture of 2 girls in bikini, painting eachother. I argued both were legal pictures, but it was again either comly or quit.
So again, I gave in. After all, what small offer it was to delte a handfull of pictures to get full access to this community again?
But even this was not enough. I received this message:
nude contents featuring models under the age of 18, and most generally contents depict these individuals in a ‘sexually driven’ manner such as posing in lingerie or displaying a sexually suggestive or provocative pose, are strictly forbidden
I have and had NO pictures of underage girls in any of the above mentioned poses or situations, but at the end I saw no alternative then to delete any picture containing any nudity whatsoever.
However, I urge you all to review your own pictures, for I am pretty sure these rules apply to many of your pictures too.
Send a message
Search for members
